SHARE

Incompressible Data Test

For this test, we set CrystalDiskMark to the default mode, which uses incompressible data.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

On the sequential read benchmark with QD 32, the 960 EVO was 94% faster than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

On the sequential write benchmark witn QD 32, the 960 EVO was 68% faster than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

On the random read test with 4 kiB blocks and QD 32, the 960 EVO was 31% faster than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks and QD 32, the 960 EVO was 16% slower than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

On the sequential read benchmark, the 960 EVO was 44% faster than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD

And on the sequential write benchmark, the 960 EVO was 65% faster than the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD vs Samsung 960 EVO

On the random read benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the 960 EVO performed similarly to the HyperX Predator.

Samsung 950 EVO 500 GiB SSD vs Samsung 960 EVO

On the random write benchmark with 4 kiB blocks, the 960 EVO was 22% faster than the HyperX Predator.