[nextpage title=”Introduction”]
Spire provides three models within its BlackDragon series: 400 W, 500 W, and 600 W. None of them has the 80 Plus certification. Let’s see if the 400 W model is a good buy.
Units from the BlackDragon series are manufactured by Seventeam.
Figure 1: Spire BlackDragon 400 W power supply
Figure 2: Spire BlackDragon 400 W power supply
The Spire BlackDragon 400 W is 5.5” (140 mm) deep, using a 120 mm fan on its bottom (no indication of the manufacturer).
The unit doesn’t have a modular cabling system, and all cables are protected with nylon sleeves, which come from inside the unit. This power supply comes with the following cables:
- Main motherboard cable with a 20/24-pin connector, 16.5” (42 cm) long
- One cable with two ATX12V connectors that together form an EPS12V connector, 15.7” (40 cm) long
- One cable with one six/eight-pin connector for video cards, 16.5” (42 cm) long
- Two cables, each with two SATA power connectors, 16.5” (42 cm) to the first connector, 7.9” (20 cm) between connectors
- Two cables, each with two standard peripheral power connectors, 16.9” (43 cm) to the first connector, 5.9” (15 cm) between connectors
All wires are 18 AWG, which is the correct gauge to be used
The number of connectors is adequate for an entry-level 400 W power supply.
Let’s now take an in-depth look inside this power supply.
[nextpage title=”A Look Inside the Spire BlackDragon 400 W”]
We decided to disassemble this power supply to see what it looks like inside, how it is designed, and what components are used. Please read our “Anatomy of Switching Power Supplies” tutorial to understand how a power supply works and to compare this power supply to others.
On this page we will have an overall look, and then in the following pages we will discuss in detail the quality and ratings of the components used.
Figure 8: The printed circuit board
[nextpage title=”Transient Filtering Stage “]
As we have mentioned in other articles and reviews, the first place we look when opening a power supply for a hint about its quality, is its filtering stage. The recommended components for this stage are two ferrite coils, two ceramic capacitors (Y capacitors, usually blue), one metalized polyester capacitor (X capacitor), and one MOV (Metal-Oxide Varistor). Very low-end power supplies use fewer components, usually removing the MOV and the first coil.
In the transient filtering stage, this power supply is flawless, with one X capacitor and two Y capacitors more than the minimum required.
Figure 9: Transient filtering stage (part 1)
Figure 10: Transient filtering stage (part 2)
On the next page, we will have a more detailed discussion about the components used in the Spire BlackDragon 400 W.
[nextpage title=”Primary Analysis”]
On this page, we will take an in-depth look at the primary stage of the Spire BlackDragon 400 W. For a better understanding, please read our “Anatomy of Switching Power Supplies” tutorial.
This power supply uses one GBU808 rectifying bridge, which is attached to the same heatsink used by the components from the active PFC circuit. This bridge supports up to 8 A at 100° C. In theory, you would be able to pull up to 920 W from a 115 V power grid. Assuming 80% efficiency, the bridge would allow this unit to deliver up to 736 W without burning itself out. Of course, we are only talking about this particular component. The real limit will depend on all the components combined in this power supply.
The active PFC circuit uses two FDPF18N50 MOSFETs, each one supporting up to 18 A at 25° C or 10.8 A at 100° C in continuous mode (note the difference temperature makes), or 72 A at 25° C in pulse mode. These transistors present a 265 mΩ maximum resistance when turned on, a characteristic called RDS(on). The lower the number the better, meaning that the transistor will waste less power, and the power supply will
have a higher efficiency.
Figure 12: The active PFC transistors and diode
The output of the active PFC circuit is filtered by one 220 µF x 420 V electrolytic capacitor from CapXon, labeled at 85° C.
In the switching section, two FQPF12N60 MOSFETs are employed using the traditional two-transistor forward configuration. Each transistor supports up to 5.8 A at 25° C or 3.7 A at 100° C in continuous mode or up to 23 A at 25° C in pulse mode, with a maximum RDS(on) of 700 mΩ.
Figure 14: The switching transistors
The switching transistors and active PFC circuit are controlled by the omnipresent CM6800 controller.
Figure 15: Active PFC/PWM controller
Let’s now take a look at the secondary of this power supply.
[nextpage title=”Secondary Analysis”]
The Spire BlackDragon 400 W uses a regular design in its secondary, with Schottky rectifiers.
The maximum theoretical current that each line can deliver is given by the formula I / (1 – D) where D is the duty cycle used and I is the maximum current supported by the rectifying diode. As an exercise, we can assume a duty cycle of 30 percent.
The +12 V output uses two PFR30L60CT Schottky rectifiers, each supporting up to 30 A (15 A per internal diode at 110° C, maximum voltage drop of 0.60 V), giving us a maximum theoretical current of 43 A or 514 W for this output.
The +5 V output uses one PFR30V30CT Schottky rectifier, which supports up to 30 A (15 A per internal diode at 90° C, maximum voltage drop of 0.44 V), giving us a maximum theoretical current of 21 A or 257 W for this output.
The +3.3 V output uses two PFR30V45CT Schottky rectifiers, each supporting up to 30 A (15 A per internal diode at 110° C, maximum voltage drop of 0.47 V), giving us a maximum theoretical current of 43 A or 141 W for this output.
Figure 16: The +3.3 V, +5 V, and +12 V rectifiers
The outputs of the power supply are monitored by a WT7502 integrated circuit, which only provides over voltage (OVP) and under voltage (UVP) protections.
The electrolytic capacitors available in the secondary are also from CapXon, and labeled at 105° C, as usual.
[nextpage title=”Power Distribution”]
In Figure 19, you can see the power supply label containing all the power specs.
According to the manufacturer, this unit has two +12 V rails. However, this information is false, since inside the unit all yellow (+12 V) wires are connected to a single point, and the monitoring circuit doesn’t have over current protection, which is a prerequisite to support multiple +12 V rails. Click here to learn more about this subject.
How much power can this unit really deliver? Let’s find out.[nextpage title=”Load Tests”]
We conducted several tests with this power supply, as described in the article, “Hardware Secrets Power Supply Test Methodology.”
First, we tested this power supply with five different load patterns, trying to pull around 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of its labeled maximum capacity (actual percentage used listed under “% Max Load”), watching the behavior of the reviewed unit under each load. In the table below, we list the load patterns we used and the results for each load.
If you add all the powers listed for each test, you may find a different value than what is posted under “Total” below. Since each output can have a slight variation (e.g., the +5 V output working at 5.10 V), the actual total amount of power being delivered is slightly different than the calculated value. In the “Total” row, we are using the real amount of power being delivered, as measured by our load tester.
The +12VA and +12VB inputs listed below are the two +12 V independent inputs from our load tester. During this test, the +12VA and +12VB inputs were connected to the power supply’s single +12 V rail. (The +12VB input was connected to the power supply EPS12V connector.)
Input | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Test 5 |
+12VA | 2.5 A (30 W) | 5.5 A (66 W) | 8 A (96 W) | 10.5 A (126 W) | 13.5 A (162 W) |
+12VB | 2.5 A (30 W) | 5.5 A (66 W) | 8 A (96 W) | 10.5 A (126 W) | 13 A (156 W) |
+5 V | 1 A (5 W) | 2 A (10 W) | 4 A (20 W) | 6 A (30 W) | 8 A (40 W) |
+3.3 V | 1 A (3.3 W) | 2 A (6.6 W) | 4 A (13.2 W) | 6 A (19.8 W) | 8 A (26.4 W) |
+5VSB | 1 A (5 W) | 1.5 A (7.5 W) | 2 A (10 W) | 2.5 A (12.5 W) | 3 A (15 W) |
-12 V | 0.5 A (6 W) td> | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) | 0.5 A (6 W) |
Total | 80.1 W | 158.2 W | 241.4 W | 320.4 W | 401.4 W |
% Max Load | 20.0% | 39.6% | 60.4% | 80.1% | 100.4% |
Room Temp. | 44.8° C | 43.1° C | 43.0° C | 43.7° C | 45.6° C |
PSU Temp. | 47.3° C | 45.4° C | 45.0° C | 45.9° C | 47.9° C |
Voltage Regulation | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Ripple and Noise | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Failed at +3.3 V and +5VSB |
AC Power | 102.9 W | 190.4 W | 290.9 W | 391.3 W | 501.7 W |
Efficiency | 77.8% | 83.1% | 83.0% | 81.9% | 80.0% |
AC Voltage | 117.5 V | 118.3 V | 117.2 V | 116.5 V | 115.4 V |
Power Factor | 0.983 | 0.98 | 0.988 | 0.991 | 0.994 |
Final Result | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Fail |
Since this power supply didn’t receive the 80 Plus certification, we were not worried about the efficiency below 80% during our test one, with the power supply delivering 80 W. Except for this load, efficiency was good for an entry-level unit, even though the manufacturer promises 86% efficiency, which we didn’t see.
All positive voltages were closer to their nominal values than required (3% regulation), which is excellent. The -12 V output was outside this tighter range, but was still inside the allowed range. The ATX12V specification states that positive voltages must be within 5% of their nominal values, and negative voltages must be within 10% of their nominal values.
Let’s discuss the ripple and noise levels on the next page. [nextpage title=”Ripple and Noise Tests “]
Voltages at the power supply outputs must be as “clean” as possible, with no noise or oscillation (also known as “ripple”). The maximum ripple and noise levels allowed are 120 mV for +12 V and -12 V outputs, and 50 mV for +5 V, +3.3 V and +5VSB outputs. All values are peak-to-peak figures. We consider a power supply as being top-notch if it can produce half or less of the maximum allowed ripple and noise levels.
The Spire BlackDragon 400 W presented noise and ripple levels above the maximum allowed at +3.3 V and +5VSB when delivering 400 W. From our experience, the high jump in noise and ripple from our test four to test five indicates that the unit had surpassed its operating limits. This is not surprising given Spire’s reputation for buying power supplies from Seventeam and labeling them at wattages higher than Seventeam’s intended wattage.
Input | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Test 5 |
+12VA | 13.2 mV | 11.2 mV | 10.4 mV | 15.4 mV | 23.8 mV |
+12VB | 19.6 mV | 11.4 mV | 18.4 mV | 24.8 mV | 33.2 mV |
+5 V | 10.8 mV | 8.4 mV | 9.8 mV | 12.2 mV | 14.2 mV |
+3.3 V | 15.0 mV | 9.8 mV | 13.4 mV | 20.2 mV | 54.6 mV |
+5VSB | 15.2 mV | 11.0 mV | 16.4 mV | 30.2 mV | 119.6 mV |
-12 V | 19.4 mV | 13.2 mV | 21.6 mV | 26.8 mV | 30.2 mV |
Below you can see the waveforms of the outputs during test five.
Figure 20: +12VA input from load tester during test five at 401.4 W (23.8 mV)
Figure 21: +12VB input from load tester during test five at 401.4 W (33.2 mV)
Figure 22: +5V rail during test five at 401.4 W (14.2 mV)
Figure 23: +3.3 V rail during test five at 401.4 W (54.6 mV)
Let’s see if we can pull more than 400 W from this unit.
[nextpage title=”Overload Tests”]
Below you can see the maximum we could pull from this power supply. The objective of this test is to see if the power supply has its protection circuits working properly. This unit passed this test, since it shut down when we tried to pull more than what is listed below. During this test, noise and ripple levels were way above the maximum allowed at +3.3 V (at 143.8 mV), +5VSB (at 145.6 mV), and -12 V (at 125.4 mV) outputs. Voltages were below the minimum allowed at +12VA (+10.89 V), +12VB (+10.43 V), and +5 V (+4.53 V), and above the maximum allowed at -12 V (-10.43 V). It is clear that the protection that kicked in was the under voltage protection (UVP), and the unit was operating way above its limits.
Input | Overload Test |
+12VA | 18 A (216 W) |
+12VB | 18 A (216 W) |
+5 V | 8 A (40 W) |
+3.3 V | 8 A (26.4 W) |
+5VSB | 3 A (15 W) |
-12 V | 0.5 A (6 W) |
Total | 515.8 W |
% Max Load | 129.0% |
Room Temp. | 48.2° C |
PSU Temp. | 49.4° C |
AC Power | 680.0 W |
Efficiency | 75.9% |
AC Voltage | 113.7 V |
Power Factor | 0.995 |
[nextpage title=”Main Specifications”]
The main specifications for the Spire BlackDragon 400 W power supply include:
- Standards: ATX12V 2.3 and EPS12V 2.91
- Nominal labeled power: 400 W
- Measured maximum power: 515.8 W at 48.2° C
- Labeled efficiency: 86%
- Measured efficiency: Between 77.8% and 83.1%, at 115 V (nominal, see complete results for actual voltage)
- Active PFC: Yes
- Modular Cabling System: No
- Motherboard Power Connectors: One 20/24-pin connector and two ATX12V connectors that together form an EPS12V connector
- Video Card Power Connectors: One six/eight-pin connector
- SATA Power Connectors: Four on two cables
- Peripheral Power Connectors: Four on two cables
- Floppy Disk Drive Power Connectors: None
- Protections (as listed by the manufacturer): Over voltage (OVP), over current (OCP), over temperature (OTP), and short-circuit (SCP) protections
- Are the above protections really available? The unit also has under voltage (UVP) protecti
on, but it doesn’t have over current (OCP) protection. - Warranty: Two years
- Real Manufacturer: Seventeam
- More Information: https://www.spire-corp.com
- MSRP in the U.S.: USD 80.00
[nextpage title=”Conclusions”]
At first glance, the Spire BlackDragon 400 W looks like a good entry-level power supply, with a good cable configuration and the manufacturer promising 86% efficiency.
Efficiency was between 77.8% and 83.1% on our tests. It’s not as high as promised by the brand, but it is good enough for an entry-level power supply. Voltage regulation was very good, with all positive voltages within 3% of their nominal values, while the ATX12V specification allows for a 5% margin. Noise and ripple levels were very low when we pulled up to 80% of the power supply labeled wattage, i.e., up to 320 W.
At 400 W, noise and ripple levels skyrocketed, which usually means the power supply surpassed its operating limits. Due to Spire’s reputation for buying power supplies from Seventeam and adding 50 to 100 more watts to the original label (click here to read the full story), we wouldn’t be surprised if this unit was originally a 350 W unit relabeled to 400 W.
Even though we know that entry-level systems won’t pull anything closer to 400 W, we can’t recommend this unit. The fact that it has a suggested price of USD 80 makes our non-recommendation easier. For less than that, you can buy the new Seasonic G-360, which is a vastly superior unit for the savvy user building an entry-level PC.
Leave a Reply