SHARE

Performance in programs

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R15 is based on the Cinema 4D software. It is very useful to measure the performance gain obtained by the presence of several processing cores while rendering heavy 3D images. Rendering is an area where a bigger number of cores helps a lot, because usually this kind of software recognize several processors (Cinebench R15, for example, can use up to 256 processing cores).

We ran the CPU benchmark, which renders a complex image using all the processing cores (real and virtual) to speed up the process. The result is given as a score.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

On Cinebench R15 CPU benchmark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was 19% slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 11% faster than the Core i9-7900X.

Blender

Blender is a image and movie redering software that uses all the threads of the CPU. We used the program to render a heavy image of a project named Gooseberry Benchmark. The graph below shows the time the CPU used to finish the image, so the less, the better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

On Blender, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was 18% slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 10% slower than the Core i9-7900X.

CPU-Z

On its current version, the well-known hardware identification software CPU-Z comes with a benchmarking tool, which measures CPU performance for one core and for all available cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

On the single thread benchmark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was similar to the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and was 6% slower than the Core i9-7900X.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

On the multiple thread benchmark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was 23% slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 31% faster than the Core i9-7900X.

Handbrake

Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video engine to speed up the conversion process. We converted a 1 GiB, 1920x1080i, 23,738 kbps, .mov video file to a smaller 320×200, H.264, .MP4 file for viewing on a smartphone.┬áThe results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Here the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was 11% slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and performed similarly to the Core i9-7900X.

WinRAR

Another task where the CPU is very demanded is on file compacting. We ran a test compacting a folder with 8 GiB on 6.813 files to a file, using WinRAR 4.2. The graph below shows the time taken on each test.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

On WinRAR, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X was 8% slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and take the same time of the Core i9-7900X.