NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Video Card Review
By Gabriel Torres on November 17, 2010


Introduction

NVIDIA has recently released its fastest GPU to date, the GeForce GTX 580. Let’s see how it compares to what was until then the fastest NVIDIA GPU, the GeForce GTX 480, and its competitors from AMD.

The video card we are reviewing is the reference model from NVIDIA. When a video card is first launched, all “manufacturers” buy their video cards already assembled from NVIDIA and only add their sticker to it. One or other manufacturer may add an overclocking, but physically all cards are absolutely identical. Only after a while manufacturers start launching customized solutions, changing the cooler and, sometimes, redesigning the printed circuit board.

The new GeForce GTX 580 can be found between USD 520 and USD 580, which puts it as the most expensive video card available on the market today. The Radeon HD 5970, which is the most powerful video card using an AMD GPU, can be bought for USD 500. In this review we will be comparing the GeForce GTX 580 to the GeForce GTX 480 and to the Radeon HD 5970. We also decided to compare the GeForce GTX 580 to two Radeon HD 6870 video cards in CrossFireX mode. Since each one of them cost around USD 260, this setup competes directly with the GeForce GTX 580.

In the table below we compare the main specs of the video cards included in our review. As mentioned, we connected two Radeon HD 6870 in parallel, and the specs below are for only one video card. The Radeon HD 5970 has two GPUs, and the specs below are for only one of the GPUs (this video card has a total of 2 GB, 1 GB connected to each GPU).

Video Card

Core Clock

Shader Clock

Memory Clock (Real)

Memory Clock (Effective)

Memory Interface

Memory Transfer Rate

Memory

Shaders

Price

GeForce GTX 480

700

1,401 MHz

924 MHz

3,696 MHz

384-bit

177.4 GB/s

1.5 GB GDDR5

480

USD 450 - 510

GeForce GTX 580

772 MHz

1,544 MHz

1,002 MHz

4,008 MHz

384-bit

192.4 GB/s

1.5 GB GDDR5

512

USD 520 –580

Radeon HD 6870

900 MHz

900 MHz

1.05 GHz

4.2 GHz

256-bit

134.4 GB/s

1 GB GDDR5

1,120

USD 260 – 270

Radeon HD 5970

725 MHz

725 MHz

1 GHz

4 GHz

256-bit

128 GB/s

1 GB GDDR5

1,600

USD 500

Prices were researched at Newegg.com on the day we published this review. All graphics chip listed above are DirectX 11 parts.

You can compare the specs of these video cards with other video cards by taking a look at our AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table and NVIDIA Chips Comparison Table tutorials. 

Now let’s take an in-depth look at the GeForce GTX 580 reference model.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Below we have an overall look at the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 reference model.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

This video card has two DVI-D and one HDMI connectors.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 3: Video connectors

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (Contíd)

In Figure 4, you can see the video card with its cooler removed. Note how it requires one six- and one eight-pin auxiliary power connectors. In Figures 5 and 6, you can see the cooler by itself. It has a copper base using vapor chamber technology, which is the same technology behind heat-pipes.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 4: Video card with the cooler removed

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 5: The GPU cooler

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 6: The GPU cooler

The reviewed card uses 12 1 Gbit GDDR5 chips, making its 1.5 GB video memory (1 Gbit x 12 = 1.5 GB). Each chip is connected to the GPU using a 32-bit data lane, making the video card’s 384-bit memory interface (32 bits x 12 = 384).

The chips used are K4G10325FE-HC04 parts from Samsung, which support up to 1.25 GHz (4.5 GHz QDR) and since on this video card memory is accessed at 1 GHz (4 GHz QDR), there is a nice 12.5% margin for you to increase the memory clock rate while keeping the chips inside the maximum they support. Of course you can always try to overclock the memory chips above their specs.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
click to enlarge
Figure 7: Memory chips

Before seeing the performance results, let’s recap the main features of this video card.

Main Specifications

The main specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 video card include:

* Researched at Newegg.com on the day we published this review.

How We Tested

During our benchmarking sessions, we used the configuration listed below. Between our benchmarking sessions the only variable was the video card being tested.

Hardware Configuration

Software Configuration

Driver Versions

Software Used

Error Margin

We adopted a 3% error margin. Thus, differences below 3% cannot be considered relevant. In other words, products with a performance difference below 3% should be considered as having similar performance.

3DMark Vantage Professional

3DMark Vantage measures Shader 4.0 (i.e., DirectX 10) performance and supports PhysX, a programming interface developed by Ageia (now part of NVIDIA) to transfer physics calculations from the system CPU to the video card GPU in order to increase performance. Mechanical physics is the basis for calculations about the interaction of objects. For example, if you shoot, what exactly will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? Note that since we are considering only the GPU score provided by this program, physics calculations are not taken into account.

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600. First we used the “Performance” profile, and then we used the “Extreme” profile (basically enabling anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x, and putting all detail settings at their maximum or “extreme” values). The results being compared are the “GPU Scores” achieved by each video card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Performance

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

21920

13%

Radeon HD 5970

20880

8%

GeForce GTX 580

19371

 

GeForce GTX 480

14821

-23%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Performance

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

18424

19%

Radeon HD 5970

17298

12%

GeForce GTX 580

15469

 

GeForce GTX 480

11532

-25%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Performance

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

11338

26%

Radeon HD 5970

10527

17%

GeForce GTX 580

8985

 

GeForce GTX 480

6625

-26%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Extreme

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

16968

7%

Radeon HD 5970

16330

3%

GeForce GTX 580

15882

 

GeForce GTX 480

12160

-23%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Extreme

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

14162

12%

Radeon HD 5970

13497

7%

GeForce GTX 580

12638

 

GeForce GTX 480

9580

-24%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

3DMark Vantage - Extreme

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

8529

15%

Radeon HD 5970

8239

11%

GeForce GTX 580

7409

 

GeForce GTX 480

5616

-24%

Call of Duty 4

Call of Duty 4 is a DirectX 9 game implementing high-dynamic range (HDR) and its own physics engine, which is used to calculate how objects interact. For example, if you shoot, exactly what will happen to the object when the bullet hits it? Will it break? Will it move? Will the bullet bounce back? It gives a more realistic experience to the user.

To get accurate results, we had to disable the 80 FPS limit in the game. To do this, input the command, “/seta com_maxfps 1000” (minus the quotes) into the console (` key). It can be set to any number greater than 200.

We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600, maxing out all image quality controls (i.e., everything was set to the maximum values in the Graphics and Texture menus). We used the internal game benchmarking feature, running a demo provided by NVIDIA called “wetwork.” We are putting this demo here for downloading if you want to run your own benchmarks. We ran the demo five times, and the results below are the average number of frames per second (FPS) achieved by each video card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Call of Duty 4 - Maximum

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

176.4

2%

GeForce GTX 580

172.3

 

Radeon HD 5970

168.2

-2%

GeForce GTX 480

164.2

-5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Call of Duty 4 - Maximum

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

170.1

7%

Radeon HD 5970

164.4

4%

GeForce GTX 580

158.6

 

GeForce GTX 480

146.2

-8%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Call of Duty 4 - Maximum

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

139.4

23%

Radeon HD 5970

135.2

19%

GeForce GTX 580

113.7

 

GeForce GTX 480

100.3

-12%

Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead is a DirectX 10 game based on the same engine as the original Crysis, but optimized (it runs under DirectX 9.0c when installed on Windows XP).

We used the HardwareOC Crysis Warhead Benchmark Tool to collect the data for this test.We ran this program at three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600, all at very high image quality (but with no anti-aliasing and no anisotropic filtering) and using the Airfield demo. The results below are the number of frames per second achieved by each video card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Crysis Warhead - Very High

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

51

13%

Radeon HD 5970

48

7%

GeForce GTX 580

45

 

GeForce GTX 480

43

-4%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Crysis Warhead - Very High

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

48

23%

Radeon HD 5970

44

13%

GeForce GTX 580

39

 

GeForce GTX 480

37

-5%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Crysis Warhead - Very High

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

34

31%

Radeon HD 5970

30

15%

GeForce GTX 580

26

 

GeForce GTX 480

24

-8%

Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2 is based on an entirely new game engine called Dunia, which is DirectX 10 when played under Windows Vista with a DirectX 10 compatible video card.

We used the benchmarking utility that comes with this game, setting image quality to Ultra High (x8 anti-aliasing) and running the “Ranch Long” demo three times. The results below are expressed in frames per second and are an arithmetic average of the three results collected.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

FarCry 2 - Ultra

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

129.0

11%

GeForce GTX 580

116.7

 

Radeon HD 5970

109.2

-6%

GeForce GTX 480

103.3

-12%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

FarCry 2 - Ultra

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

118.2

17%

GeForce GTX 580

101.1

 

Radeon HD 5970

96.2

-5%

GeForce GTX 480

88.8

-12%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

FarCry 2 - Ultra

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

80.5

17%

GeForce GTX 580

69.0

 

Radeon HD 5970

64.9

-6%

GeForce GTX 480

59.5

-14%

Aliens vs. Predator

Aliens vs. Predator is a DirectX 11 game that makes full use of tessellation and advanced shadow rendering. We used the Aliens vs. Predator Benchmark Tool developed by Rebellion. This program reads its configuration from a textfile (our configuration files can be found here). We ran this program at 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600 resolutions, with max texture settings, 32x anisotropic filtering and 8x anti-aliasing.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Aliens vs. Predator

1680x1050

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

62.8

21%

Radeon HD 5970

61.3

18%

GeForce GTX 580

52.0

 

GeForce GTX 480

44.7

-14%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Aliens vs. Predator

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

51.4

21%

Radeon HD 5970

50.4

18%

GeForce GTX 580

42.6

 

GeForce GTX 480

37.3

-12%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Aliens vs. Predator

2560x1600

Difference

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

31.6

17%

Radeon HD 5970

30.8

14%

GeForce GTX 580

27.1

 

GeForce GTX 480

23.2

-14%

Lost Planet 2

Lost Planet 2 is a game that uses a lot of DirectX 11 features, like tessellation (to round out the edges of polygonal models), displacement maps (added to the tessellated mesh to add fine grain details), DirectCompute soft body simulation (to introduce more realism in the “boss” monsters), and DirectCompute wave simulation (to introduce more realism in the physics calculations in water surfaces; when you move or when gunshots and explosions hit the water, it moves accordingly). We reviewed the video cards using Lost Planet 2 internal benchmarking features, choosing the “Benchmark A” (we know that “Benchmark B” is the one recommended for reviewing video cards, however, at least with us, results were inconsistent). We set graphics at “high,” anti-aliasing at “MSAA8x” and DX11 at “full.” The results below are the number of frames per second generated by each video card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Lost Planet 2

1680x1050

Difference

GeForce GTX 580

50.90

 

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

49.50

-3%

Radeon HD 5970

46.70

-8%

GeForce GTX 480

42.40

-17%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Lost Planet 2

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 580

44.70

 

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

41.20

-8%

Radeon HD 5970

40.20

-10%

GeForce GTX 480

37.30

-17%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Lost Planet 2

2560x1600

Difference

GeForce GTX 580

31.70

 

Radeon HD 6870 x2 - CrossFireX

31.50

-1%

Radeon HD 5970

30.10

-5%

GeForce GTX 480

26.50

-16%

Conclusions

The new GeForce GTX 580 is indeed the fastest NVIDIA GPU ever released. It was between 31% and 36% faster on 3DMark Vantage and between 5% and 20% faster on games than its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 480.

However, it may not the fastest video card around. The Radeon HD 5970 was up to 19% faster than the GeForce GTX 580 in most games and simulations we ran. The only two games where the GeForce GTX 580 was faster than the Radeon HD 5970 were Far Cry 2 (between 5% and 7%) and Lost Planet 2 (between 5% and 11%). Since the Radeon HD 5970 is cheaper than the new GeForce GTX 580, we believe its competitor from AMD brings a better bang for the buck.

Another alternative if you have around USD 500 to spend on a video card is to buy two Radeon HD 6870 cards and connect them in CrossFireX. In our tests this configuration proved to be up to 31% faster (and a little bit cheaper) than a single GeForce GTX 580. The only exception was on Lost Planet 2, where the new NVIDIA video card was up to 8% faster. The advantage of this configuration is that you don’t need to buy the two video cards at the same time, so if money is short, you can buy one today and the second card when that extra money shows up.

Originally at http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-580-Video-Card-Review/1133


© 2004-14, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law.

We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets.