IDF Spring 2006 Coverage
By Gabriel Torres on March 7, 2006


Intel Developer Forum (IDF) Spring 2006 edition has just started in San Francisco, CA. Today several announcements were made, the most important one being the details of Intelís next-generation microarchitecture, now called Core, which will be used on Intelís forthcoming processors. In this article you will see the highlights of the opening keynote given by Justin Rattner, Intelís CTO, with the latest announcements by Intel on the CPU arena.

Rattner talked about his concern with power consumption and presented a very interesting chart showing energy per instruction vs. performance of several Intel CPUs, i.e., how much energy a given instruction consumes to be processed and the driven performance. As you can see on the chart, in Figure 1, this ratio was increasing rapidly until Pentium 4, but dropped to the same level of the very first Pentium processor with Pentium M. That is why Pentium M was the architecture of choice when Intel decided to replace Netburst architecture (which is used by Pentium 4). This ratio got even better with the introduction of Duo Core CPU (a.k.a. Yonah).

IDF Spring 2006
click to enlarge
Figure 1: Energy per instruction vs. performance.

Intelís CTO also bragged about being one year ahead of competition in delivering 65 nm CPUs in volume to the market and showed us some interesting figures. Intelís 65-nm process provides 20% greater performance and consumes 30% less energy than Intelís 90-nm process. Intelís 45-nm process will reach the market next year and will provide 20% performance increase and a 30% power reduction compared to 65 nm process.

65 nm Process
click to enlarge
Figure 2: Intelís 65-nm process advantages over 90-nm process.

45 nm process
click to enlarge
Figure 3: Intelís 45-nm process advantages over 65-nm process.

With that, Ratter introduced Intelís new microarchitecture, Core.

Core Microarchitecture

Core microarchitecture is based on Pentium Mís, which in turn is based on Pentium IIIís. For a better understanding on this subject, we recommend you to read our tutorial Inside Pentium M Architecture.

Intel Core Microarchitecture
click to enlarge
Figure 4: Intel Core microarchitecture.

This new architecture introduces the following new features over Pentium Mís:

Due to the keynote dynamics Rattner wasnít able to explain in depth details about each one of these features. However we are scheduled to attend to a class specifically about the new Core microarchitecture, and as soon as we have this information we will publish a tutorial explaining in details this new microarchitecture.

Rattner also gave an idea how CPUs based on this new microarchitecture will perform compared to CPUs from current-generation CPUs. Merom will be 20% faster than a comparable Core Duo T2600 and keeping the same power consumption; Conroe will be 40% faster and consume 40% less energy than a comparable Pentium D (950 model); and Woodcrest will be 80% faster and consume 35% less energy than a comparable Xeon (2.8 GHz, dual-core, 2 MB L2 cache). Nowadays on a Xeon-based server the CPU represents almost 50% of the system consumption. With Woodcrest, the CPU consumption represents only 33%, and thus the other parts of the server should be optimized to consume less power in the near future.

By the way, Conroeís TDP (Thermal Power Design) will be of 65 W.

More On Multi-Core

Another important announcement on this morning keynote was the confirmation that Intel will deliver quad-core CPUs next year. With that, Rattner decided to explain why multi-core technology is better than just raising the CPU clock.

The chart in Figure 5 is quite interesting. If you overclock your CPU by 20%, the performance wonít increase 20% (since the overall performance of a computer doesnít depend only on the CPU) and power consumption will increase a lot (73%). However, if you underclock your CPU by 20%, the power consumption will drop a lot (50%), while the performance wonít drop that much (87% of the original performance).

Overclock Power and Performance
click to enlarge
Figure 5: Overclocking and underclocking effects on performance and power.

So, if you get two ďunderclockedĒ CPUs and build them dual-core, the power consumption will be equivalent of a single-core CPU running at its full clock rate, however the performance leap will be impressive (73% greater, according to Intel), achieving the same performance level of an overclocked CPU but consuming far less.

click to enlarge
Figure 6: The dual-core approach.

Originally at

© 2004-15 Clube do Hardware, all Rights Reserved.

Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law.

We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets.