AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition Video Card Review
By Gabriel Torres on February 15, 2012


Introduction

The new Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition, which is being released today, is a mainstream video card based on the latest graphics architecture from AMD, dubbed “Graphics Core Next” or simply “GCN,” which supports the new PCI Express 3.0 connection and the latest DirectX version (11.1).

For a detailed explanation of the new features present on this latest architecture, please read our Radeon HD 7970 review.

AMD is also releasing a cheaper version of this video card, the Radeon HD 7750, which we will cover in a separate review. The Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon HD 7770 use the codename “Cape Verde.” By the way, this country is located in the Northern Hemisphere, not in the Southern. (This new GPU architecture from AMD used by these video cards is codenamed “Southern Islands.”)

At USD 160, the new Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition is available with the same price range as the Radeon HD 6850 and the GeForce GTX 460 with 1 GB. During its presentations, AMD compared the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition against the GeForce GTX 550 Ti, but they are in different price segments. In the table below, we compare the main specifications of the video cards included in our review. As you can see, the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition works at 1 GHz, and hence its name. The prices listed below do not include rebates and are for the models with the clock and memory configurations listed below. Prices were researched at Newegg.com on the day we published this review, except for the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition, which is the price advertised by AMD.

Video Card

Core Clock

Shader Clock

Memory Clock (Effective)

Memory Interface

Memory Transfer Rate

Memory

Shaders

DirectX

Price

Radeon HD 7770

1 GHz

1 GHz

4.5 GHz

128-bit

72 GB/s

1 GB GDDR5

640

11.1

USD 160

Radeon HD 6850

775 MHz

775 MHz

4 GHz

256-bit

128 GB/s

1 GB GDDR5

960

11

USD 140 - 170

GeForce GTX 460

675 MHz

1,350 MHz

3.6 GHz

256-bit

115.2 GB/s

1 GB GDDR5

336

11

USD 140 - 150

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

900 MHz

1.8 GHz 

4.1 GHz

192-bit

98.4 GB/s

 1 GB GDDR5

192

11

USD 120 - 130

You can compare the specs of these video cards with other video cards by taking a look at our “AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table” and “NVIDIA Chips Comparison Table” tutorials.

Today, only the LGA2011 Core i7 processors (“Sandy Bridge-E”) have a PCI Express 3.0 controller. In our Radeon HD 7970 review, we discovered that, at this time, there is no difference between using a PCI Express 2.0 or a PCI Express 3.0 connection. Since the reviewed video card is a mainstream product, we decided to use a different testing platform, based on a Core i5-2500K processor.

Now let’s take a complete look at the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition reference model.

The AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

Below we have an overall look at the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHZ Edition reference model. It requires one six-pin auxiliary power connector.

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 1: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

One of the highlights of this video card is the possibility of connecting up to six video monitors at the same time, which is achieved by using a DisplayPort hub or a DisplayPort monitor that provides daisy-chaining capability. The card provides one DVI-D, one HDMI, and two mini DisplayPort connectors.

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 3: Video connectors

The AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition (Contíd)

The Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition uses a standard aluminum cooler with a 80 mm fan.

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 4: Video card cooler

In Figure 5, you can see the video card with its cooler removed. It uses a voltage regulator with three phases for the GPU and one phase for the memory chips. The phases for the GPU uses ferrite-core coils, but the phase for the memory uses an iron-core coil. All capacitors used on this video card are solid.

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 5: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

The reviewed video card uses four Hynix H5GQ2H24MFR-T2C GDDR5 chips, each one storing 2 Gbit of data, making the 1 GB of memory available on this video card. Each chip is connected to the GPU through a 32-bit lane, creating the 128-bit datapath that is available. These chips can run up to 5 GHz. On this video card, they are accessed at 4.5 GHz, leaving an 11% margin for you to increase the memory clock still within specifications. Of course, you can always try to push the memory clock above its specs.

AMD Radeon HD 7770
click to enlarge
Figure 6: Memory chips

Before seeing the performance results, let’s recap the main features of this video card.

Main Specifications

The main specifications for the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition reference model include:

How We Tested

During our benchmarking sessions, we used the configuration listed below. Between our benchmarking sessions, the only variable was the video card being tested.

Hardware Configuration

Software Configuration

Driver Versions

Software Used

Error Margin

We adopted a 3% error margin. Thus, differences below 3% cannot be considered relevant. In other words, products with a performance difference below 3% should be considered as having similar performance.

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is a very popular DirectX 9 game that was released in 2010. Though this game uses an old version of DirectX, the number of textures that can be represented on one screen can push most of the top-end graphics cards to their limits. StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty uses its own physics engine that is bound to the CPU and thus does not benefit from PhysX.

We tested this game at 1920x1200. The quality of the game was set to the “extreme” preset. We then used FRAPS to collect the frame rate of a replay on the “Unit Testing” custom map. We used a battle between very large armies to stress the video cards. 

Radeon HD 7770

Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

79.0

6.3%

Radeon HD 6850

76.8

3.4%

Radeon HD 7770

74.3

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

63.8

16.4%

Far Cry 2

Released in 2008, Far Cry 2 is based on a game engine called Dunia, which is DirectX 10. We used the benchmarking utility that comes with this game at 1920x1200, setting overall quality to “high,” adjusting anti-aliasing to “4x,” and running the “Ranch Long” demo three times. The results below are expressed in frames per second and are an arithmetic average of the three results collected.

Radeon HD 7770

FarCry 2

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

57.8

8.5%

Radeon HD 6850

57.5

8.0%

Radeon HD 7770

53.3

 

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

45.3

17.6%

Aliens vs. Predator

Aliens vs. Predator is a DirectX 11 game that makes full use of tessellation and advanced shadow rendering. We used the Aliens vs. Predator Benchmark Tool developed by Rebellion. This program reads its configuration from a text file. (Our configuration file can be found here.) We ran this program at 1920x1200, with texture set at “high,” shadows set at “low,” with anisotropic filtering and anti-aliasing disabled.

Radeon HD 7770

Aliens vs. Predator

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 6850

40.3

19.2%

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

38.6

14.2%

Radeon HD 7770

33.8

 

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

27.3

23.8%

DiRT3

DiRT3 is a DirectX 11 game in which we measured the video cards’ performance by running a race and then playing it back using FRAPS. We ran this game at 1920x1200 with image quality set to “high” and with anti-aliasing disabled.

Radeon HD 7770

Dirt 3

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

86.4

11.6%

Radeon HD 7770

77.4

 

Radeon HD 6850

75.2

3.0%

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

67.5

14.7%

Deus Ex: Human Revolution

Deus Ex: Human Revolution is another DirectX 11 game. We used the in-game introduction to measure the number of frames per second, using FRAPS. We ran the introduction at 1920x1200, configuring image quality settings at “very high” and with anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering disabled.

Radeon HD 7770

Deus Ex: Human Revolution

1920x1200

Difference

Radeon HD 7770

49.8

 

Radeon HD 6850

48.0

3.7%

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

46.3

7.5%

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

43.8

13.7%

Battlefield 3

Battlefield 3 is the latest installment in the Battlefield franchise released in 2011. It is based on the Frostbite 2 engine, which is DirectX 11. In order to measure performance using this game, we walked our way through the first half of the “Operation Swordbreaker” mission, measuring the number of frames per second using FRAPS. We ran this game at 1920x1200, configuring image quality settings at “high” and disabling anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering.

Radeon HD 7770

Battlefield 3

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

53.0

2.2%

Radeon HD 7770

51.8

 

Radeon HD 6850

50.8

2.0%

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

43.6

18.8%

3DMark 11 Professional

3DMark 11 Professional measures Shader 5.0 (i.e., DirectX 11) performance. We ran this program at 1920x1200, selecting the four graphics tests available and deselecting the other tests available. We used two image quality settings, “entry” and “performance,” both at their default settings. The results being compared are the “GPU Score” achieved by each video card.

Radeon HD 7770

3DMark 11 - Entry

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

2214

18.5%

Radeon HD 6850

2098

12.3%

Radeon HD 7770

1869

 

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

1516

23.3%

Radeon HD 7770

3DMark 11 - Performance

1920x1200

Difference

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

1845

13.7%

Radeon HD 6850

1792

10.4%

Radeon HD 7770

1623

 

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

1255

29.3%

Media Espresso 6.5

Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video card to speed up the conversion process. We converted a 449 MB, 1920x1080i, 18,884 kbps, MPEG2 video file to a smaller 640x360, H.264, .MPG4 file for viewing on a portable device such as an iPhone or iPod Touch. We also ran this test on our CPU (Core i5-2500K) in order to compare the difference in performance between a mainstream CPU and a mainstream GPU to transcode video.

Radeon HD 7770

Media Espresso 6.5

Seconds

Difference

Radeon HD 7770

41

 

GeForce GTX 460 1 GB

46

10.9%

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

50

18.0%

Radeon HD 6850

52

21.2%

Core i5-2500K

67

38.8%

Conclusions

AMD is promoting the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition as a competitor to the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. It really crushed this video card, being between 14% and 29% faster than it. But there is just a “small” problem: the GeForce GTX 550 Ti costs USD 130, while the Radeon HD 7770 GHz costs USD 160. At this price range, the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition in reality competes with the Radeon HD 6850 and the GeForce GTX 460 with 1 GB video cards that proved to be superior. Let’s see.

The Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition was faster than the Radeon HD 6850 and the GeForce GTX 460 with 1 GB only at Deus Ex: Human Revolution (by 4% and 8%, respectively), being marginally faster than the Radeon HD 6850 on DiRT3. All video cards achieved the same performance level on Battlefield 3. On all the other games and simulations we ran, the other two video cards were faster. The Radeon HD 6850 was between 3% and 19% faster, while the GeForce GTX 460 with 1 GB was between 8% and 18% faster.

On Media Espresso, however, the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition was substantially faster than its competitors, with an advantage of 12% over the GeForce GTX 460 with 1 GB and 27% over the Radeon HD 6850. It was also 63% faster than our Core i5-2500K for video transcoding. This shows that the new “GCN” architecture is really optimized for the processing of “regular” programs, as promised by AMD.

Analyzing gaming performance alone, we think that if you have around USD 150 to spend on a video card, you will be better off buying one of the “older” video cards.

Originally at http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD-Radeon-HD-7770-GHz-Edition-Video-Card-Review/1489


© 2004-14, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law.

We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets.