| Sempron 3000+ and Celeron D 331 Review | |||||||||||||
| By Daniel Barros on December 4, 2006 | Page 5 of 15 | ||||||||||||
PCMark05 Professional PCMark05 Professional measures the system performance by running several tests. We selected two batches for our comparisons, System and CPU. The System batch performs the following tests: HDD XP Startup, Physics and 3D, 2D Transparent Window, 3D Pixel Shader, Web Page Rendering, File Decryption, 2D Graphics Memory – 64 lines, HDD General Usage and three multithreading tests. The CPU batch performs the following tests: File Compression, File Decompression, File Encryption, File Decryption, Image Decompression, Audio Compression and two multithreading tests. The results are given in a PCMark05 specific unit.
On system batch, the Sempron 3000+ (1.8 GHz) was 3.27% faster than the Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz), that is, they both achieved almost the same performance. On CPU batch, Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz) was 17.97% faster than the AMD processor. | |||||||||||||
| Originally at http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/404/5 | Pages (15): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 » ... Last » | ||||||||||||
© 2004-8, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law. We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets. | |||||||||||||