Sempron 3000+ and Celeron D 331 Review
By Daniel Barros on December 4, 2006 Page 4 of 15

SYSmark2004

We benchmarked the CPUs’ overall performance by using the SYSmark2004, a program that simulates the use of real-world applications. Thus, we consider this the best software to measure, in practical terms, the system performance.

The benchmarks are divided into two groups:

  • Internet Content Creation: Simulates the authoring of a website containing text, images, videos and animations. The following programs are used: Adobe After Effects 5.5, Adobe Photoshop 7.01, Adobe Premiere 6.5, Discreet 3ds Max 5.1, Macromedia Dreamweaver MX, Macromedia Flash MX, Microsoft Windows Media Encoder 9, McAfee VirusScan 7.0 and Winzip 8.1.
  • Office Productivity: Simulates the use of an office suite, i.e. simulates sending e-mails, word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, etc. The following programs are used: Adobe Acrobat 5.05, Microsoft Office XP SP2, Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1, NaturallySpeaking 6, McAfee VirusScan 7.0 and Winzip 8.1.

This software delivers several results, all of them using a specific SYSmark2004 unit. First we have a SYSmark2004 overall score. Then we have a group result for each batch listed above. And for each batch, we have specific results: 3D Creation, 2D Creation and Web Publication for Internet Content Creation; and Communication, Document Creation and Data Analysis for Office Productivity.

You can see the results in the graphic below:

Sempron 3000+(1.8 GHz)  

Celeron D 331(2.66 GHz)

Difference

SYSmark2004 - Score

138

110

+25.45%

Internet Content Creation - Score

149

120

+24.17%

3D Creation

144

110

+30.91%

2D Creation

169

132

+28.03%

WEB Publication

136

118

+15.25%

Office Productivity - Score

128

101

+26.73%

Communication

122

94

+29.79%

Document Creation

139

102

+36.27%

Data Analysis

123

106

+16.04%

Sempron 3000+ (1.8 GHz) achieved performance, in average, 26% superior to the Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz) on SYSmark2004.

Although the Intel CPU has 860 MHz more than the AMD model tested, it was beaten in all the tests performed by SYSmark. Really impressive.


Originally at http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/404/4Pages (15): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 » ... Last »

© 2004-8, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law.

We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets.