| Sempron 3000+ and Celeron D 331 Review | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| By Daniel Barros on December 4, 2006 | Page 4 of 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
SYSmark2004 We benchmarked the CPUs’ overall performance by using the SYSmark2004, a program that simulates the use of real-world applications. Thus, we consider this the best software to measure, in practical terms, the system performance. The benchmarks are divided into two groups:
This software delivers several results, all of them using a specific SYSmark2004 unit. First we have a SYSmark2004 overall score. Then we have a group result for each batch listed above. And for each batch, we have specific results: 3D Creation, 2D Creation and Web Publication for Internet Content Creation; and Communication, Document Creation and Data Analysis for Office Productivity. You can see the results in the graphic below:
Sempron 3000+ (1.8 GHz) achieved performance, in average, 26% superior to the Celeron D 331 (2.66 GHz) on SYSmark2004. Although the Intel CPU has 860 MHz more than the AMD model tested, it was beaten in all the tests performed by SYSmark. Really impressive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Originally at http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/404/4 | Pages (15): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 » ... Last » | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-8, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Total or partial reproduction of the contents of this site, as well as that of the texts available for downloading, be this in the electronic media, in print, or any other form of distribution, is expressly forbidden. Those who do not comply with these copyright laws will be indicted and punished according to the International Copyrights Law. We do not take responsibility for material damage of any kind caused by the use of information contained in Hardware Secrets. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||