Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Home » Gabriel's Blog

ATI: Recycling Old Cards With New Names
Author: Gabriel TorresDate: August 24, 2006 - 5:56 AM PST

Yesterday ATI launched three new chips. I don’t know if you paid close attention to their specs, but Radeon X1300 XT and Radeon X1650 Pro are actually a Radeon X1600 Pro and a Radeon X1600 XT with new names.

While all other members of Radeon X1300 family have 4 pixel shader engines, Radeon X1300 XT has 12, just like Radeon X1600 Pro. Radeon X1300 XT and Radeon X1600 Pro run at the same clock rate (500 MHz) and access memory at the same bit rate (128-bit). The only difference between them is the memory clock rate, which is 800 MHz on Radeon X1300 XT and 780 MHz on Radeon X1600 Pro – a 2.5% increase, which is completely negligible and probably won’t even be measurable on reviews.

Almost the same thing happens between Radeon X1600 XT and Radeon X1650 Pro. Both have 12 pixel shader engines and access memory at the same bit rate (128-bit). Radeon X1650 Pro runs at 600 MHz while Radeon X1600 XT runs at 590 MHz – a ridiculous 1.7% clock increase –, while the new model accesses memory at 1.4 GHz against 1.38 GHz on Radeon X1600 XT – 1.45% increase. We bet that Radeon X1650 Pro will achieve the same performance as Radeon X1600 XT on reviews.

So, what is the point of releasing these “new” cards? Just to say “hey, we want to make you believe that we have something new”? Simply ridiculous.

Radeon X1950 XTX, however, is definitely a new product. While it has the same specs of Radeon X1900 XTX, it accesses memory at 2 GHz using the new GDDR4 technology (Radeon X1900 XTX accesses its memory at 1.55 GHz).

Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark This Entry | Permalink | Comments (4) top

Archive
 
November, 2009
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 
 
 .:: Oct 2009 (1) 

RSSLatest Content
SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
NZXT Gamma Case Review
Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
ASUS U-75HA 750 W Power Supply Review
MSI P55-GD80 Motherboard
Thermaltake Element V Case Review
Nokia 7705 Twist Cell Phone Review
Cooler Master Hyper TX3 CPU Cooler Review
Some Pictures from Our Office
Antec Two Hundred Case Review
Corsair TX950W Power Supply Review
XFX Radeon HD 5770 Video Card Review
XFX Radeon HD 5750 Video Card Review
Scythe Big Shuriken CPU Cooler Review

Our Most Popular Articles
Maximum CPU Temperature
1,070,397 views
How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
694,621 views
nVidia Chips Comparison Table
671,172 views
Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
585,474 views
How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
555,696 views
AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
553,927 views
ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
485,721 views
ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
474,757 views
How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
389,136 views
Sempron vs. Athlon XP
336,479 views

Latest Threads in Our Forums
Is it a vga problem or motherboard has shocked?
by ftomsuk
Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
by cchjde
Is it possible LCD Monitor leaked by itself ?
by delta32
Suddenly death syndrome and pendrives
by Desert Fox
better cpu cooler?
by sam_wade07
Video Transfer camcorder to PC
by fjs559
Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
by Hardware Secrets Team
Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
by Merman
SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
by Olle P
Understanding Over Current Protection
by Olle P
.:: Visit Our Forums ::.


© 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)