Hardware Secrets


Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
Editorial
First Look
Gabriel’s Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Facebook
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Upgrading and Repairing PCs (19th Edition)
Upgrading and Repairing PCs (19th Edition), by Scott Mueller (Que), starting at $17.49
Home » CPU
Athlon II X2 240e and Athlon II X3 435 CPU Review
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Reviews Last Updated: October 20, 2009
Page: 5 of 14
Real-time pricing for Corsair VS1GBKIT400.
Corsair Memory VS1GBKIT400 1 GB PC3200 400Mhz 184-Pin DDR Desktop Kit CORSAIR VALUE SELECT D57454 Electronics Usually ships in 24 hours
Amazon: $32.80 TigerDirect: $34.99
CompUSA: $34.99

VirtualDub + DivX

With VirtualDub we converted a full-length DVD movie to DivX format and saw how long it took for this conversion to be completed. The DivX codec is capable of recognizing and using not only more than one CPU (i.e., more than one core), but also the SSE4 instruction set (feature not available on the reviewed CPUs).

The movie we chose to convert was Star Trek – The Motion Picture: Director’s Cut. We copied the movie to our hard disk drive with no compression, so the final original file on our HDD was 6.79 GB. After compressing it with DivX, the final file was only 767.40 MB, which is quite remarkable.

The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.

Athlon II X2 240e and Athlon II X3 435 CPU Review

On DivX encoding using the on-board video Athlon II X2 240e was 18.34% faster than Celeron E3200. Athlon II X3 435 was 24.61% faster than Pentium E5200, 21.62% faster than Pentium E6300 and 13.72% faster than Athlon II X2 240e. Athlon II X4 620 was 6.19% faster than Athlon II X3 435 and 19.06% faster than Athlon II X2 240e.

When we installed a GeForce 9600 GT performance increased less than 3% compared to the results taken with the on-board video, so we have to consider that there was no significant performance increase when we installed a “real” video.

« Previous |  Page 5 of 14  | Next »
Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark Article | Comments (4)

Related Content
  • How to Enable Cool
  • All Athlon 64 Models
  • Athlon II X4 620 CPU Review
  • Athlon II X4 635 and Phenom II X2 555 CPU Review
  • Athlon II X4 640 vs. Core i3 530 CPU Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    Zalman CNPS10XEXTREMEZalman CNPS10XEXTREME

    Copper/aluminum Cpu Cooler Zalman CNPS10XEXTREME 35554 Electronics Usually ships in 24 hours

    Amazon: $62.78 TigerDirect: $74.99
    Newegg: $79.99 Buy.com: $75.99

    RSSLatest News
    Antec Announces the One PC Case
    February 9, 2012 - 8:06 AM PST
    Cooler Master Releases Elite 361 PC Case
    February 8, 2012 - 7:50 AM PST
    Microsoft Launches Kinect for Windows
    February 2, 2012 - 8:42 AM PST
    Transcend Announces SSD720 SSD Series
    February 1, 2012 - 7:55 AM PST
    .:: More News ::.


    © 2004-12, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)