XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX Video Card Review

Content

Articles

Editorial

First Look

Gabriel’s Blog

News

Reviews

Tutorials

Main Menu

About Us

Awarded Products

Compare Prices

Datasheets

Dictionary

Download

Drivers

Facebook

Forums

Links

Manufacturer Finder

Newsletter

On The Web

RSS Feed

Test Your Skills

Twitter

Newsletter

Subscribe today!

Recommended

Build Your Own PC Do-It-Yourself For Dummies, by Mark L. Chambers (For Dummies), starting at $15.25

XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX Video Card Review

Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Reviews	Last Updated: July 25, 2008
Page: 6 of 13

Real-time pricing for XFX HD-695X-ZNFC
XFX AMD Radeon HD 6950 800M 1 GB DDR5 PCI-E Video Card HD695XZNFC Electronics Usually ships in 24 hours
Amazon: $239.99	TigerDirect: $244.99
CompUSA: $244.99	Wal-Mart: $249.82

3DMark06 Professional

3DMark06 measures Shader 3.0 (i.e., DirectX 9.0c) performance. We run this software under three 16:10 widescreen resolutions, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600, first with no image quality enhancements enabled – results we call “low” on the charts and tables below –, then setting 4x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. See the results below.

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 1680x1050 - Low Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 16260 9.29%
GeForce 9800 GX2 15623 5.01%
GeForce GTX 280 14904 0.17%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 14878
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 14215 4.66%
GeForce GTX 260 13701 8.59%
GeForce 9800 GTX 12759 16.61%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 11842 25.64%
Radeon HD 3870 10694 39.12%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 1920x1200 - Low Score Difference
GeForce 9800 GX2 15547 13.23%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 15489 12.81%
GeForce GTX 280 14215 3.53%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 13730
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 13017 5.48%
GeForce GTX 260 12668 8.38%
GeForce 9800 GTX 11631 18.05%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 10691 28.43%
Radeon HD 3870 9454 45.23%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 2560x1600 - Low Score Difference
GeForce 9800 GX2 13015 18.57%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 12315 12.19%
GeForce GTX 280 11766 7.19%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 10977
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 10159 8.05%
GeForce GTX 260 9894 10.95%
GeForce 9800 GTX 8743 25.55%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 8077 35.90%
Radeon HD 3870 6823 60.88%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 1680x1050 - High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 16260 38.94%
GeForce 9800 GX2 13900 18.77%
GeForce GTX 280 12157 3.88%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 11703
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 11063 5.79%
GeForce GTX 260 10617 10.23%
GeForce 9800 GTX 8981 30.31%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 8881 31.78%
Radeon HD 3870 6915 69.24%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 1920x1200 - High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 15489 47.35%
GeForce 9800 GX2 12213 16.18%
GeForce GTX 280 10991 4.56%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 10512
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 10014 4.97%
GeForce GTX 260 9450 11.24%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 7972 31.86%
GeForce 9800 GTX 7811 34.58%
Radeon HD 3870 6114 71.93%

Sapphire HD 4870

3DMark06 Professional 1.1.0 - 2560x1600 - High Score Difference
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2 12315 50.83%
GeForce 9800 GX2 9829 20.38%
GeForce GTX 280 8704 6.60%
XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX (OC) 8165
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 7550 8.15%
GeForce GTX 260 7285 12.08%
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 5896 38.48%
GeForce 9800 GTX 5774 41.41%
Radeon HD 3870 4319 89.05%

« Previous | Page 6 of 13 | Next »

Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark Article | Comments (2)