We ran this program under three 16:10 widescreen resolutions: 1680x1050, 1920x1200 and 2560x1600, first using the “Performance” profile, then using the “Extreme” profile – which basically enables anti-aliasing at 4x, anisotropic filtering at 16x and put all details settings at their maximum value (called “extreme”). The combination of 2560x1600 resolution with extreme settings didn’t produce reliable results according to the program, so we aren’t going to add them here. The results we are comparing are the “GPU Score” achieved by each video card.

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 - 1680x1050 – Performance	Score	Difference
GeForce GTX 280	7695	36.17%
GeForce 9800 GX2	6990	23.69%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2	5651
GeForce 9800 GTX	3805	48.52%
Radeon HD 3870	2977	89.82%

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 - 1920x1200 – Performance	Score	Difference
GeForce GTX 280	6106	40.82%
GeForce 9800 GX2	5379	24.05%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2	4336
GeForce 9800 GTX	2891	49.98%
Radeon HD 3870	2269	91.10%

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 - 2560x1600 – Performance	Score	Difference
GeForce GTX 280	3549	48.99%
GeForce 9800 GX2	2910	22.17%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2	2382
GeForce 9800 GTX	1557	52.99%
Radeon HD 3870	1244	91.48%

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 -1680x1050 - Extreme	Score	Difference
GeForce GTX 280	6005	68.35%
GeForce 9800 GX2	4858	36.19%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2	3567
GeForce 9800 GTX	2703	31.96%
Radeon HD 3870	1855	92.29%

3DMark Vantage Professional 1.0.1 -1920x1200 - Extreme	Score	Difference
GeForce GTX 280	4732	77.29%
GeForce 9800 GX2	3508	31.43%
Sapphire Atomic Radeon HD 3870 X2	2669
GeForce 9800 GTX	2038	30.96%
Radeon HD 3870	1439	85.48%