Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible, 6th Edition (2 Vol. Set)
The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible, 6th Edition (2 Vol. Set), by Winn L Rosch (Que), starting at $2.32
Home » CPU
How The Memory Cache Works
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Tutorials Last Updated: September 12, 2007
Page: 3 of 9
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for Intel Celeron E1500 Socket 775 65mm Dual-Core Processor with 2.2GHz 800MHz FSB 512KB L2 Cache Model BX80557E1500 Retail Box Free Ground Shipping $.
Directron: $49.99 Newegg: $49.99
CircuitCity: $49.99 CDW: $62.99

History of Memory Cache on PCs

This section is only for those interested on the historic aspects of memory cache. If you are not interested on this subject you can simply jump to the next page.

Memory cache was first used on PCs at the 386DX timeframe. Even though the CPU itself didn’t have memory cache inside, its support circuitry – i.e. the chipset – had a memory cache controller. Thus the memory cache at this time was external to the CPU and thus was optional, i.e. the motherboard manufacturer could add it or not. If you had a motherboard without memory cache your PC would be far slower than a PC with this circuit. The amount of available memory cache varied as well depending on the motherboard model and typical values for that time were 64 KB and 128 KB. At this time the memory cache controller used an architecture known as “write-through”, where for write operations – i.e. when the CPU wants to store data in memory – the memory cache controller updates the RAM memory immediately.

With the 486DX processor Intel added a small amount (8 KB) of memory cache inside the CPU. This internal memory cache was called L1 (level 1) or “internal”, while the external memory cache was called L2 (level 2) or “external”. The amount and existence of the external memory cache depended on the motherboard model. Typical amounts for that time were 128 KB and 256 KB. Later 486 models added the “write back” cache architecture, which is used until today, where for write operations the RAM memory isn’t updated immediately, the CPU stores the data on the cache memory and the memory controller updates the RAM memory only when a cache miss occurs.

Then with the first Pentium processor Intel created two separated internal memory caches, one for instructions and another for data (at the time with 8 KB each). This architecture is still used to date, and that is why you sometimes see the L1 memory cache being referred as 64 KB + 64 KB, for example – this is because there are one 64 KB instruction L1 cache and one 64 KB data L1 cache. Of course we will explain later what is the difference between the two. At that time the L2 memory cache continued to be located on the motherboard, so its amount and existence depended on the motherboard model. Of course having a system without memory cache was insane. Typical amounts for that time were 256 KB and 512 KB.

On AMD side K5, K6 and K6-2 processors used this same architecture, with K6-III having a third memory cache (L3, level 3).

The problem with the L2 memory cache being external is that it is accessed with a lower clock rate, because since 486DX2 the CPU internal clock rate is different from the CPU external clock rate. While a Pentium-200 worked internally at 200 MHz, it accessed its L2 memory cache at 66 MHz, for example.
 
Then with P6 architecture Intel moved the memory cache from the motherboard to inside the CPU – what allowed the CPU to access it with its internal clock rate –, except on Pentium II, where the memory cache was not located inside the CPU but on the same printed circuit board where the CPU was soldered to (this printed circuit board was located inside a cartridge), running at half the CPU internal clock rate, and on Celeron-266 and Celeron-300, which had no memory cache at all (and thus they were the worst-performing CPUs in PC history).

This same architecture is used until today: both L1 and L2 memory caches are located inside the CPU running at the CPU internal clock rate. So the amount of memory cache you can have on your system will depend on the CPU model you have; there is no way to increase the amount of memory cache without replacing the CPU.

Pages (9): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (0)

Related Content
  • Penryn Core New Features
  • nVidia Tesla Technology
  • Inside Intel Nehalem Microarchitecture
  • Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, Phenom X3 and Phenom X4: Which One is the Best USD 200 CPU?
  • Everything You Need to Know About the CPU C-States Power Saving Modes

  • Recommended Deal.
    Phenom II Black CPU Processor Edition AM3 965 3AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Deneb 3.4GHz 4 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Socket AM3 140W Quad-Core Processor - Retail HDZ965FBGIBOX


    Newegg: $195.99 CircuitCity: $209.99
    Directron: $209.99 CDW: $249.99

    RSSLatest News
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    November 6, 2009 - 3:07 PM PST
    Mushkin Launches Memories with Copper-made Heatsink
    November 5, 2009 - 3:49 PM PST
    Super Talent Launches USB 3.0 Flash Memories
    November 5, 2009 - 3:47 PM PST
    VIA Announces Nano 3000 Processor Series
    November 5, 2009 - 3:42 PM PST
    Sapphire Announces Vapor-X HD 5870 and HD 5750 Video Cards
    November 5, 2009 - 3:38 PM PST
    Gelid Unveils Tranquillo CPU Cooler
    November 5, 2009 - 3:36 PM PST
    Noctua Intros NH-D14 Premium CPU Cooler
    November 3, 2009 - 8:14 PM PST
    Transcend Unveils DDR3-1333 Memory Kits
    November 3, 2009 - 7:57 PM PST
    EVGA Launches GeForce GTX 275 CO-OP PhysX Edition
    November 3, 2009 - 7:51 PM PST
    Akasa Launches Freedom Xone Mid-tower Case
    November 2, 2009 - 6:05 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    NZXT Gamma Case Review
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    ASUS U-75HA 750 W Power Supply Review
    MSI P55-GD80 Motherboard
    Thermaltake Element V Case Review
    Nokia 7705 Twist Cell Phone Review
    Cooler Master Hyper TX3 CPU Cooler Review
    Some Pictures from Our Office
    Antec Two Hundred Case Review
    Corsair TX950W Power Supply Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5770 Video Card Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5750 Video Card Review
    Scythe Big Shuriken CPU Cooler Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,070,537 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    694,815 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    671,252 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    585,584 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    555,776 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    553,977 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    485,755 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    474,785 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    389,214 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    336,501 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Is it a vga problem or motherboard has shocked?
    by ftomsuk
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    by cchjde
    Is it possible LCD Monitor leaked by itself ?
    by delta32
    Suddenly death syndrome and pendrives
    by Desert Fox
    better cpu cooler?
    by sam_wade07
    Video Transfer camcorder to PC
    by fjs559
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    by Merman
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    by Olle P
    Understanding Over Current Protection
    by Olle P
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)