Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible, 6th Edition (2 Vol. Set)
The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible, 6th Edition (2 Vol. Set), by Winn L Rosch (Que), starting at $2.31
Home » CPU
How The Memory Cache Works
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Tutorials Last Updated: September 12, 2007
Page: 3 of 9
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for Intel.gif Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition 975 / 3.33 GHz processor BX80601975 $.
Computers4Sure: $23.40 Amazon: $1086.31
Newegg: $999.99 CircuitCity: $974.99

History of Memory Cache on PCs

This section is only for those interested on the historic aspects of memory cache. If you are not interested on this subject you can simply jump to the next page.

Memory cache was first used on PCs at the 386DX timeframe. Even though the CPU itself didn’t have memory cache inside, its support circuitry – i.e. the chipset – had a memory cache controller. Thus the memory cache at this time was external to the CPU and thus was optional, i.e. the motherboard manufacturer could add it or not. If you had a motherboard without memory cache your PC would be far slower than a PC with this circuit. The amount of available memory cache varied as well depending on the motherboard model and typical values for that time were 64 KB and 128 KB. At this time the memory cache controller used an architecture known as “write-through”, where for write operations – i.e. when the CPU wants to store data in memory – the memory cache controller updates the RAM memory immediately.

With the 486DX processor Intel added a small amount (8 KB) of memory cache inside the CPU. This internal memory cache was called L1 (level 1) or “internal”, while the external memory cache was called L2 (level 2) or “external”. The amount and existence of the external memory cache depended on the motherboard model. Typical amounts for that time were 128 KB and 256 KB. Later 486 models added the “write back” cache architecture, which is used until today, where for write operations the RAM memory isn’t updated immediately, the CPU stores the data on the cache memory and the memory controller updates the RAM memory only when a cache miss occurs.

Then with the first Pentium processor Intel created two separated internal memory caches, one for instructions and another for data (at the time with 8 KB each). This architecture is still used to date, and that is why you sometimes see the L1 memory cache being referred as 64 KB + 64 KB, for example – this is because there are one 64 KB instruction L1 cache and one 64 KB data L1 cache. Of course we will explain later what is the difference between the two. At that time the L2 memory cache continued to be located on the motherboard, so its amount and existence depended on the motherboard model. Of course having a system without memory cache was insane. Typical amounts for that time were 256 KB and 512 KB.

On AMD side K5, K6 and K6-2 processors used this same architecture, with K6-III having a third memory cache (L3, level 3).

The problem with the L2 memory cache being external is that it is accessed with a lower clock rate, because since 486DX2 the CPU internal clock rate is different from the CPU external clock rate. While a Pentium-200 worked internally at 200 MHz, it accessed its L2 memory cache at 66 MHz, for example.
 
Then with P6 architecture Intel moved the memory cache from the motherboard to inside the CPU – what allowed the CPU to access it with its internal clock rate –, except on Pentium II, where the memory cache was not located inside the CPU but on the same printed circuit board where the CPU was soldered to (this printed circuit board was located inside a cartridge), running at half the CPU internal clock rate, and on Celeron-266 and Celeron-300, which had no memory cache at all (and thus they were the worst-performing CPUs in PC history).

This same architecture is used until today: both L1 and L2 memory caches are located inside the CPU running at the CPU internal clock rate. So the amount of memory cache you can have on your system will depend on the CPU model you have; there is no way to increase the amount of memory cache without replacing the CPU.

Pages (9): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (0)

Related Content
  • Penryn Core New Features
  • nVidia Tesla Technology
  • Inside Intel Nehalem Microarchitecture
  • Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, Phenom X3 and Phenom X4: Which One is the Best USD 200 CPU?
  • Everything You Need to Know About the CPU C-States Power Saving Modes

  • Recommended Deal.
    Power Supply VX450W 450W ATXAmazon.com Corsair CMPSU-450VX 450-Watt VX Series 80 Plus Certified Power Supply compatible with Core i7 and i5 Electronics


    Amazon: $73.89 Wal-Mart: $89.98
    Newegg: $64.99 TigerDirect: $79.99

    RSSLatest News
    IN WIN LAN Party in Southern California
    November 20, 2009 - 12:37 PM PST
    Patriot Announces PS-100 SSD Series
    November 19, 2009 - 7:30 AM PST
    Antec Launches TPQ-1200 PSU
    November 18, 2009 - 11:30 AM PST
    AMD/ATI Launches Radeon HD 5970
    November 18, 2009 - 10:18 AM PST
    OCZ Launches Colossus SSD Series
    November 17, 2009 - 1:39 PM PST
    NZXT Unleashes Tempest EVO Mid-Tower Case
    November 17, 2009 - 1:06 PM PST
    nVidia Launches GeForce GT 240
    November 17, 2009 - 10:18 AM PST
    Arctic Cooling Announces Accelero TWIN TURBO PRO VGA Cooler
    November 16, 2009 - 11:46 AM PST
    PowerColor Announces PLAY! HD5770 Video Card
    November 13, 2009 - 12:51 PM PST
    G.Skill Announces Falcon II SSD Series
    November 11, 2009 - 3:31 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    Ultra X4 500 W Power Supply Review
    Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
    Nintendo Wii Fit Plus Review
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    Gigabyte G41M-ES2L Motherboard
    Netflix on Playstation 3 Review
    CM Storm Sentinel Advance Mouse Review
    Titan Skalli CPU Cooler Review
    Nexus RX-6300 630 W Power Supply Review
    Gigabyte P55-UD6 Motherboard
    Nintendo Wii Review
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    NZXT Gamma Case Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,078,254 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    706,106 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    679,046 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    593,331 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    562,397 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    560,046 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    487,917 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    477,086 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    394,441 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    338,498 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Dell Inspiron 6000 Powers but will not boot...
    by Merman
    Ultra X4 500 W Power Supply Review
    by Merman
    IN WIN LAN Party in Southern California
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Getting A Hard Copy
    by Trevorrross
    Am I Making The Right Choice?
    by need2know
    Is it available to mount the Zalman cooler?
    by Olle P
    dsl modem prob
    by Sherry
    Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Overclocking a dell xps 410
    by 6dracing
    How to recover mp3's, pdf & chm files, applications from formated harddrive partition
    by tomahawk 1705
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)