Hardware Secrets

Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
Editorial
First Look
Gabriel’s Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Facebook
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search



Home » CPU
Core 2 Duo E6750 Review
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Reviews Last Updated: June 24, 2007
Page: 1 of 12
Introduction

We received from Intel a Core 2 Duo E6750 engineering sample, which is basically a Core 2 Duo E6700 with a 1,333 MHz FSB instead of 1,066 MHz. It will be launched later this summer together with several other Core 2 Duo models with the new 1,333 MHz FSB, and from the naming used on E6750 we can assume that Intel will use the number ”50“ on their model numbers to indicate the new external clock rate. Since we also had available a Core 2 Duo E6700 and a Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in our lab, we could make a terrific comparison between these three CPUs – as all three run internally at 2.66 GHz – to answer two basic questions: By how much the new 1,333 MHz FSB will improve PC performance? What is better, a quad-core CPU with 1,066 MHz FSB or a dual-core CPU with 1,333 MHz FSB? Read on.

Core 2 Duo E6750
click to enlarge
Figure 1: Core 2 Duo E6750 engineering sample.

The only difference between Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo E6700 is really the external clock rate: 1,333 MHz vs. 1,066 MHz. All other specs are the same, like the 4 MB L2 memory cache.

This new external bus works at 333 MHz transferring four data chunks per clock cycle, and that is why it is referred as 1,333 MHz (333 MHz x 4). In reality it doesn’t work at 1,333 MHz.

Core 2 Duo E6750
click to enlarge
Figure 2: Core 2 Duo E6750 specs.

Because this CPU is based on the new 1,333 MHz FSB, it requires a motherboard supporting this new FSB. So you won’t be able to install this or any other CPU based on the new 1,333 MHz external bus on older socket LGA775 motherboards, meaning that you probably won’t be able to upgrade your CPU with a new one by just replacing the processor, you will probably need to replace your motherboard as well.

Intel P35 and NVIDIA nForce 680i or 650i chipsets are some of the chipsets that support the new 1,333 MHz FSB. In our review we used a MSI P35 Platinum motherboard, which is based on the new Intel P35 chipset, but we faced a problem with this motherboard during our tests that we need to explain.

We were using DDR2-1066/PC2-8500 memories and we tried to keep them always running at 1,066 MHz, however this was only possible when the CPU external clock was of 1,066 MHz. With other clock rates the motherboard didn’t provide a memory clock multiplier that resulted in 1,066 MHz. With the FSB set at 800 MHz – which was necessary by our Pentium 4 3.4 GHz – the maximum clock rate we could set for our memories was also 800 MHz. For the Core 2 Duo E6750 we had the option to set our memories at 800 MHz, 1000 MHz, 1110 MHz or 1333 MHz. We tried to keep them at 1110 MHz but the system was unstable, thus we set them at 1000 MHz, 66 MHz below the clock rate they should be running at. This slight difference should not impact the final results.

In the table below we summarized below all CPUs included in this review with their main specs. We also added a column called ”memory clock“ for you to know the clock rate our memories were running when we collected data for each CPU – the clock rate below 1,066 MHz was a limitation from the motherboard we were using.

CPU

Cores

Internal Clock

External Clock

L2 Memory Cache

Platform

TDP

Memory Clock

Core 2 Extreme QX6700

4

2.66 GHz

1,066 MHz (266 MHz x 4)

4 MB x 2

Socket LGA775

130 W

1,066 MHz

Core 2 Extreme X6800

2

2.93 GHz

1,066 MHz (266 MHz x 4)

4 MB

Socket LGA775

75 W

1,066 MHz

Core 2 Duo E6750

2

2.66 GHz

1,333 MHz (333 MHz x 4)

4 MB

Socket LGA775

65 W *

1,000 MHz

Core 2 Duo E6700

2

2.66 GHz

1,066 MHz (266 MHz x 4)

4 MB

Socket LGA775

65 W

1,066 MHz

Pentium 4 550

1

3.4 GHz

800 MHz (200 MHz x 4)

1 MB

Socket LGA775

115 W

800 MHz

* To be confirmed.

Unfortunately Intel didn’t provide us a Pentium D or a Pentium Extreme Edition samples for reviewing, and AMD seems to be out of samples and new high-end CPUs, because we haven’t received new samples from them for ages. A pity. If you’d like to see a comparison between the reviewed CPUs and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, please read our Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Review.

Page 1 of 12  | Next »
Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark Article | Comments (4)

Related Content
  • Details on Intelís Forthcoming 45 nm Manufacturing Technology
  • Core 2 Extreme QX6850 Review
  • Inside Intel Nehalem Microarchitecture
  • Core 2 Duo E7200 CPU Review
  • Celeron, Pentium Dual Core and Athlon X2: Which One is the Best USD 70 CPU?


  • RSSLatest News
    LUXA2 Releases New P1-PRO Battery Power Pack
    October 1, 2013 - 7:23 AM PST
    MSI unveils GP70 and GP60 Laptops
    September 30, 2013 - 7:23 AM PST
    AMD Unveils Next-Generation Radeon Graphics Cards
    September 27, 2013 - 5:33 AM PST
    Genius Introduces Energy Mouse in North America
    September 27, 2013 - 5:32 AM PST
    Apple Updates iMac
    September 25, 2013 - 5:27 AM PST
    .:: More News ::.







    © 2004-13, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)