Hardware Secrets


Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
Editorial
First Look
Gabriel’s Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Facebook
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Upgrading and Repairing PCs (19th Edition)
Upgrading and Repairing PCs (19th Edition), by Scott Mueller (Que), starting at $17.49
Home » Motherboard
ASUS M2A-VM Motherboard Review
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Reviews Last Updated: March 26, 2007
Page: 10 of 12
Real-time pricing for Cybertron TPCESS2APH8450.
CybertronPC Essential PH8450 Desktop PC AMD Phenom X3 8450 2.10GHz Triple Core Asus M2A-VM Motherboard 4GB DDR2-800 PC6400 250GB SATA2 DVDRW Flash Reader Gigabit LAN Small MT 300W NO OS
TigerDirect: $489.99 CompUSA: $489.99

3D Performance: Quake 4

Quake 4 is very heavy game that uses the same engine of Doom 3. We used the id_demo001 available on version 1.2 of Quake 4 to make our benchmarking with this game. We run this demo four times at 1024x768x32 resolution and image quality settings on ”low“. The results shown on the chart is an arithmetic average of the collected data. The results are in frames per second. For more information on how to use Quake 4 to benchmark a PC, read our tutorial on this subject.

ASUS M2A-VM (AMD 690G - RS690)

On Quake 4 the on-board video provided by AMD 690G was faster than the one provided by Radeon Xpress 1100 (10.20%) and than the one provided by GeForce 6100-405 (29.69%). But this really means nothing, as you won’t be able to play Quake 4 (or Doom 3) with the on-board video provided by this motherboard: even with image quality set to low we could only reach 8.5 frames per second.

AMD 690G was one more time beaten by the two low-end PCI Express video cards we installed: GeForce 6200 TC (64 MB, 64-bit) was 109.61% faster and GeForce 6200 (128 MB, 128-bit) was 319.22% faster than the on-board video of the reviewed motherboard.

When we installed a GeForce 7800 GTX on the reviewed card it didn’t achieve the same performance level of an ASUS M2N32-SLI De Luxe with the same video card installed: the motherboard from ASUS was 6.52% faster.

« Previous |  Page 10 of 12  | Next »
Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark Article | Comments (1)

Related Content
  • ASUS M2N32-SLI De Luxe Motherboard Review
  • ECS KN3 SLI2 Extreme Motherboard Review
  • Foxconn A690GM2MA Motherboard Review
  • ECS AMD690GM-M2 Motherboard Review
  • MSI K9AGM2-FIH Motherboard Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    EVGA 132-GT-E768-TREVGA 132-GT-E768-TR

    EVGA Core i7/Intel X58/3-Way SLI & CrossFireX/SATA3&USB3.0/A&2GbE/ATX Motherboard 132-GT-E768-TR Electronics Usually ships in 24 hours

    Amazon: $214.99 Buy.com: $191.99

    RSSLatest News
    Antec Announces the One PC Case
    February 9, 2012 - 8:06 AM PST
    Cooler Master Releases Elite 361 PC Case
    February 8, 2012 - 7:50 AM PST
    Microsoft Launches Kinect for Windows
    February 2, 2012 - 8:42 AM PST
    Transcend Announces SSD720 SSD Series
    February 1, 2012 - 7:55 AM PST
    .:: More News ::.


    © 2004-12, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)