Hardware Secrets
Home | Audio | Case | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Gabriel's Blog
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended Book
The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible (6th Edition)
By Winn L Rosch
Que
Price: $1.62

Home » Storage
Does RAID0 Really Increase Disk Performance?
Author: Gabriel Torres
Type: Reviews Last Updated: November 1, 2006
Page: 6 of 6
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for Western Digital WD VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS 300 GB SATA II Hard Drive $
TECHONWEB: $305.95 Dell: $339.99
Buy.com: $301.99 TigerDirect.com: $299.99
Newegg.com: $289.99 B&H Photo-Video: $294.95

Conclusions

So, does RAID0 really increase disk performance? Yes, definitely. In our tests RAID0 doubled the average transfer rate of our hard disk drive.

How this disk performance increase reflects on overall system performance? It will depend on the kind of application you run: programs that make a lot of disk access will be the ones most benefited, of course. On PCMark05 this increase was between 4.44% and 8.82%, while on SYSmark2004 the best result was on Communication batch, where we saw a 15.25% performance increase. On this same program, Office Productivity performance was increased up to 6.52%, while we saw a performance increase up to 8.52% on 2D Creation batch.

With the price of hard disk drives lowering every day, it makes a lot of sense to assemble a RAID0 system if you are building a high-end machine. If you are willing to pick a large hard disk drive for your system, consider buying two hard disk drives with half the size each – for example, instead of buying one 160 GB hard disk drive, pick two 80 GB hard disk drives. The total capacity will be the same and your PC will be faster. Just don’t forget to choose a motherboard with on-board RAID function.

Regarding what stripe size you should use, it will depend a lot on the kind of application you use. Since we used different programs to measure the performance of our RAID system – each one using data files with different sizes –, the performance difference between the several stripe sizes we used varied a lot.

Generally speaking, if you handle large files – e.g. you use your PC mostly for editing videos and pictures –, choose a large stripe size. In this case, 128 KB is the way to go, no question about it.

If you handle smaller files, less than 128 KB, you need to choose a smaller stripe size. We’d suggest 4 KB, which improved the performance of real-world applications on SYSmark2004.

What is the theory behind this? Stripes are the “sectors” which will be used by the RAID system on your hard disk drives. If you are using 128 KB stripes, the system will divide your files into 128 KB segments – a 10 MB movie will be cut down into 80 stripes, for example (10 MB / 128 KB = 80). If you use 4 KB stripes, this same file will be sliced into 2,560 stripes. In the first case, the computer will have to handle 80 data transfers (40 per hard disk drive), while on the second the computer will have to handle 2,560 data transfers (1,280 per hard disk drive). Of course it is easier to control 80 data transfers than 2,560 data transfers, thus the first option is better.

But why we simply don’t configure all RAID0 systems to use 128 KB stripes? The enemy of larger stripes is called slack space. If you want to save a 100 KB on a RAID0 system using 128 KB stripes, it will use two 128 KB stripes, one at each hard disk drive, because this is the minimum amount of disk space it can use. So our 100 KB file will be taking up 256 KB of disk space – more than a half will be wasted, i.e. it will be empty space that could be used.

Finding the correct balance between performance and slack space is no easy task.

Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (9)

Related Content
  • Recovering Hard Disks with Bad Blocks
  • RAID6 Advantages Over RAID0 and RAID5
  • How Perpendicular Recording Works
  • Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS Hard Disk Drive Review
  • 250 GB Hard Disk Drive Round-Up

  • Recommended Deals
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 750 GB SATA II Hard Drive


    Dell: $186.99 Newegg.com: $129.99
    Geeks.com: $107.99 TECHONWEB: $148.59
    CDW Corporation: $144.99 Superwarehouse: $60.99
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500 GB SATA Hard Drive


    TECHONWEB: $94.87 TigerDirect.com: $79.99
    Dell: $85.99 Circuit City: $119.00
    CompuVest: $66.65 J&R Music and Computer World: $149.99
    Western Digital (WD2500JBRT) 250 GB EIDE Hard Drive


    Dell: $49.99 TECHONWEB: $50.50
    Circuit City: $59.00 CompuVest: $32.99
    Geeks.com: $29.99 Dell Small Business: $143.99
    Western Digital Raptor® X WD1500AHFD 150 GB SATA Hard Drive (Retail Version)


    Best Buy: $200.99 Server Supply: $220.00
    CTI: $230.00 Tech for Less: $147.95
    MicropartsUSA: $238.00 Server Supply.com Inc: $210.00
    Western Digital (WD5000AAKS) 500 GB SATA Hard Drive


    Circuit City: $99.99 Dell: $110.99
    CompuVest: $59.99 TECHONWEB: $93.05
    Tech For Less: $184.08 Buy: $110.07

    RSSLatest News
    OCZ Launches "P45 Special" DDR2 modules
    August 7, 2008 - 7:26 AM PST
    AMD Launches 760 GX Chipset
    August 6, 2008 - 10:53 AM PST
    MSI Launches Gaming Notebooks
    August 5, 2008 - 7:53 AM PST
    Zotac Unveils Watercooled GeForce 9800 GTX+
    August 4, 2008 - 7:33 AM PST
    HIS Launches Radeon HD 4850 IceQ 4
    August 1, 2008 - 11:12 AM PST
    Thermaltake Launches RamOrd Memory Cooler
    August 1, 2008 - 9:57 AM PST
    Force3D Announces Radeon HD 4800 with Twin Turbo Cooler
    August 1, 2008 - 9:55 AM PST
    Arctic Cooling Launches Alpine 64 GT
    August 1, 2008 - 9:53 AM PST
    Spire Launches SilverBalze
    July 31, 2008 - 11:04 AM PST
    Gigabyte Unveils EP45-Extreme Motherboard Series
    July 31, 2008 - 9:31 AM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    All Athlon 64 Models
    Zalman GS1000 Case Review
    iPhone 3G Review
    Raidmax Aura Case Review
    How to Identify Japanese Electrolytic Capacitors
    Thermaltake Toughpower 1500 W Power Supply
    Razer Piranha Gaming Headset Review
    How to Use the SPDIF Output from Sound Blaster X-Fi Sound Cards
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    Small Adjustment to the Blog
    250 GB Hard Disk Drive Round-Up
    DLO TransDock Deluxe Review
    XFX GeForce GTX 260 640M XXX Video Card Review
    Sapphire HD 4870 Video Card Review
    Thermaltake BigWater 780e Water Cooler

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    750,074 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    466,655 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    416,505 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    408,271 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    403,383 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    367,106 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    333,010 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    318,624 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    276,502 views
    Sempron 3400+ Review
    266,074 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    iPhone 3G Review
    by ouchast
    When to power up/down HD in external enclosure
    by Davidj
    XFX Overclocked GeForce 7600 GT (PV-T43G-UDD3) Review
    by phillypa800
    Help for my 1st custom build.
    by Gabriel Torres
    My first build help
    by Gabriel Torres
    Can't access my folder
    by Gabriel Torres
    OCZ Launches 'P45 Special' DDR2 Modules
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Powerful Anti-virus
    by Earvin
    AMD Launches 760 GX Chipset
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Microsoft Exchange changing last name
    by rektech
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.

    © 2004-8, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)