Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods, by Jon Phillips (Que), starting at $29.99
Home » Video
HIS Overclocked Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: April 18, 2006
Page: 5 of 10
Real-time pricing for EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR.
EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition Video Card - 1280MB 448 192-bit PCI Express 2.0 x16 SLI Ready Dual DVI HDMI w/ Adapter Built-in GTS 250 PhysX processor CO-OP 012-P3-1178-TR
TigerDirect: $349.99 Newegg: $339.99
CircuitCity: $349.99 ZipZoomFly: $353.99

3DMark2001 SE

3Dmark2001 SE measures video card performance simulating DirectX 8.1 games. It is very effective software for evaluating the performance from previous-generation games, programmed using DirectX 8. In this software we run six tests. We run the software in three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32, first without antialiasing and with no frame buffer, then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and the frame buffer at triple-buffering. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our bechmarks, allowing direct comparison between them.

You may be asking yourself why we added an old program in a review of a latest generation video card. To us, it is as important to know the performance of a video card with the latest games as it is to know its performance in an older game. That’s why we kept this software in our methodology.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 6.72% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 9.59% faster than ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, 16.82% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 32.03% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 35.03% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 52.11% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 20.55% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 19.12% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 14.55% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 12.60% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 10.28% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 6.38% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 5.25% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 5.19% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 4.10% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 3.75% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 5.51% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 7.27% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 18.51% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 45.47% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 47.14% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 75.13% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to ATI Radeon X1600 XT and ATI Radeon X1900 XTX.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 26.83% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 25.80% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 21.15% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 19.17% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 17.34% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 11.14% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 10.36% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 9.02% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 6.45% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 8.70% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 16.03% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 52.89% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 70.38% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 105.83% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to XFX GeForce 6600 GT.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 44.30% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 39.94% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 37.10% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 32.78% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 30.97% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 21.18% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 19.78% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 19.01% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 12.09% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 11.90% faster and ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 4.56% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 17.08% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 35.05% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 64.27% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 78.81% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 94.45% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT and Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 30.19% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 27.81% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 23.22% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 20.32% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 14.86% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 7.66% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 6.36% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 5.59% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 5.45% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 3.54% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 5,77% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 24,70% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 52,15% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 89,11% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 116,18% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 127,23% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 48.00% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 41.06% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 37.87% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 30.92% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 24.66% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 22.78% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 15.60% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 15.32% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 5.78% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 4.42% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 4.40% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 17.54% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 49.15% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 118.69% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 142.78% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 198.58% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 132.49% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 109.47% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 108.37% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 102.21% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 97.43% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 85.30% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 52.02% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 49.89% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 43.00% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 36.99% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 21.51% faster and ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 8.33% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (3)

Related Content
  • AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
  • HIS Radeon X1600 XT Review
  • HIS Radeon X1600 Pro AGP Review
  • PowerColor Radeon X1600 Pro 512 MB Review
  • Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT Ultimate Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    EVGA 01G-P3-N981-TREVGA 01G-P3-N981-TR

    EVGA 01G-P3-N981-TR GeForce 9800 GT Video Card - 1024MB DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 2 Dual Link DVI HDTV VGA Support 01G-P3-N981-TR

    CompUSA: $139.99 TigerDirect: $139.99
    ZipZoomFly: $142.99 CircuitCity: $139.99

    RSSLatest News
    Sparkle Announces 2 GB GeForce GT 220 Video Card
    March 19, 2010 - 10:17 AM PST
    PowerColor Launches HD 5770 Eyefinity 5 Video Card
    March 19, 2010 - 9:59 AM PST
    In Win Intros IRONCLAD Mid-Tower Case
    March 19, 2010 - 9:39 AM PST
    A-Data Intros 8 GB DDR3 Memory Kit
    March 17, 2010 - 3:40 PM PST
    Intel Launches Xeon 5600 Series and Core i7-980X Processor
    March 16, 2010 - 3:46 PM PST
    Intel Launches 40 GB X25-V SSD Drive
    March 15, 2010 - 1:43 PM PST
    Arctic Cooling Intros Cooler for Radeon HD 5970 and HD 5870
    March 12, 2010 - 12:19 PM PST
    OCZ Announces 32 GB Onyx SSD Unit
    March 10, 2010 - 4:08 PM PST
    MSI Launches X-Slim X360 Laptop
    March 9, 2010 - 4:15 PM PST
    Spire Launches TherMax Eclipse II CPU Cooler
    March 8, 2010 - 2:59 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    All Mobile Celeron Models
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer Review
    All Core i5 Models
    Mionix Naos 5000 Mouse Review
    Arctic Cooling E361-WM Earphones Review
    Don’t Let Your IT Projects Become Vaporware
    OCZ Z Series 850 W Power Supply Review
    HIS Radeon HD 5570 Fan Video Card Review
    Core i7-980X CPU Review
    Gelid Tranquillo CPU Cooler Review
    How to Discover Your Power Supply Real Manufacturer
    OCZ Z Series 1000 W Power Supply Review
    Amacrox Free Earth 85PLUS 650 W Power Supply Review
    ECS A890GXM-A Motherboard
    ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 Motherboard Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,155,687 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    818,619 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    743,617 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    673,082 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    625,929 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    610,335 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    506,821 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    494,489 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    443,848 views
    Understanding RAM Timings
    381,913 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Custom PC Help
    by thebigman101
    All Mobile Celeron Models
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Sparkle Announces 2 GB GeForce GT 220 Video Card
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    PowerColor Launches HD 5770 Eyefinity 5 Video Card
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    In Win Intros IRONCLAD Mid-Tower Case
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Corsair CX400W Power Supply Review
    by Olle P
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer Review
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    A-Data Intros 8 GB DDR3 Memory Kit
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Mionix Naos 5000 Mouse Review
    by Mescalamba
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-10, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)