Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods, by Jon Phillips (Que), starting at $29.99
Home » Video
HIS Overclocked Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: April 18, 2006
Page: 5 of 10
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for ASUS P5Q Pro Turbo LGA 775 Intel P45 ATX Motherboard - Retail $.
Newegg: $129.99 OnSale.com: $133.99
TigerDirect: $129.99 eCost: $131.99

3DMark2001 SE

3Dmark2001 SE measures video card performance simulating DirectX 8.1 games. It is very effective software for evaluating the performance from previous-generation games, programmed using DirectX 8. In this software we run six tests. We run the software in three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32, first without antialiasing and with no frame buffer, then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and the frame buffer at triple-buffering. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our bechmarks, allowing direct comparison between them.

You may be asking yourself why we added an old program in a review of a latest generation video card. To us, it is as important to know the performance of a video card with the latest games as it is to know its performance in an older game. That’s why we kept this software in our methodology.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 6.72% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 9.59% faster than ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, 16.82% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 32.03% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 35.03% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 52.11% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 20.55% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 19.12% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 14.55% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 12.60% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 10.28% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 6.38% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 5.25% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 5.19% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 4.10% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 3.75% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 5.51% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 7.27% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 18.51% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 45.47% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 47.14% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 75.13% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to ATI Radeon X1600 XT and ATI Radeon X1900 XTX.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 26.83% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 25.80% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 21.15% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 19.17% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 17.34% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 11.14% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 10.36% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 9.02% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 6.45% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 8.70% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 16.03% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 52.89% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 70.38% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 105.83% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to XFX GeForce 6600 GT.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 44.30% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 39.94% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 37.10% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 32.78% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 30.97% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 21.18% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 19.78% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 19.01% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 12.09% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 11.90% faster and ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 4.56% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 17.08% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 35.05% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 64.27% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 78.81% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 94.45% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT and Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 30.19% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 27.81% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 23.22% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 20.32% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 14.86% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 7.66% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 6.36% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 5.59% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 5.45% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 3.54% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 5,77% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 24,70% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 52,15% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 89,11% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 116,18% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 127,23% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 48.00% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 41.06% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 37.87% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 30.92% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 24.66% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 22.78% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 15.60% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 15.32% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 5.78% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 4.42% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 4.40% faster.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro IceQ Turbo

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was 17.54% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 49.15% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked), 118.69% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 142.78% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 198.58% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X1600 Pro Turbo (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 132.49% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 109.47% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 108.37% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 102.21% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 97.43% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 85.30% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 52.02% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 49.89% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 43.00% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 36.99% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 21.51% faster and ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 8.33% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (3)

Related Content
  • AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
  • ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
  • HIS Radeon X1600 XT Review
  • HIS Radeon X1600 Pro AGP Review
  • PowerColor Radeon X1600 Pro 512 MB Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    ECO GeForce 9800 GT Video Card USAZOTAC ZT-98GES3G-FSL GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card - Retail


    Newegg: $92.99 CompUSA: $96.99

    RSSLatest News
    IN WIN LAN Party in Southern California
    November 20, 2009 - 12:37 PM PST
    Patriot Announces PS-100 SSD Series
    November 19, 2009 - 7:30 AM PST
    Antec Launches TPQ-1200 PSU
    November 18, 2009 - 11:30 AM PST
    AMD/ATI Launches Radeon HD 5970
    November 18, 2009 - 10:18 AM PST
    OCZ Launches Colossus SSD Series
    November 17, 2009 - 1:39 PM PST
    NZXT Unleashes Tempest EVO Mid-Tower Case
    November 17, 2009 - 1:06 PM PST
    nVidia Launches GeForce GT 240
    November 17, 2009 - 10:18 AM PST
    Arctic Cooling Announces Accelero TWIN TURBO PRO VGA Cooler
    November 16, 2009 - 11:46 AM PST
    PowerColor Announces PLAY! HD5770 Video Card
    November 13, 2009 - 12:51 PM PST
    G.Skill Announces Falcon II SSD Series
    November 11, 2009 - 3:31 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    Ultra X4 500 W Power Supply Review
    Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
    Nintendo Wii Fit Plus Review
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    Gigabyte G41M-ES2L Motherboard
    Netflix on Playstation 3 Review
    CM Storm Sentinel Advance Mouse Review
    Titan Skalli CPU Cooler Review
    Nexus RX-6300 630 W Power Supply Review
    Gigabyte P55-UD6 Motherboard
    Nintendo Wii Review
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    NZXT Gamma Case Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,078,351 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    706,311 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    679,175 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    593,484 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    562,489 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    560,157 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    487,948 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    477,117 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    394,542 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    338,529 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Dell Inspiron 6000 Powers but will not boot...
    by Merman
    Ultra X4 500 W Power Supply Review
    by Merman
    IN WIN LAN Party in Southern California
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Getting A Hard Copy
    by Trevorrross
    Am I Making The Right Choice?
    by need2know
    Is it available to mount the Zalman cooler?
    by Olle P
    dsl modem prob
    by Sherry
    Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Overclocking a dell xps 410
    by 6dracing
    How to recover mp3's, pdf & chm files, applications from formated harddrive partition
    by tomahawk 1705
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)