Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods, by Jon Phillips (Que), starting at $2.22
Home » Video
XFX Overclocked GeForce 6600 256 MB (PV-T43P-UDS7) Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: February 23, 2006
Page: 5 of 10
Real-time pricing for EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR.
EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 448 192-bit PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card - Retail CO-OP 1280MB GDDR3 012-P3-1178-TR
Newegg: $339.99 TigerDirect: $349.99
CompUSA: $349.99 ZipZoomFly: $353.99

3DMark2001 SE

3DMark2001 SE measures video card performance simulating DirectX 8.1 games. It is very effective software for evaluating the performance from previous-generation games, programmed using DirectX 8. In this software we run six tests. We run the software in three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32, first without antialiasing and with no frame buffer, then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and the frame buffer at triple-buffering. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our bechmarks, allowing direct comparison between them.

You may be asking yourself why we added an old program in a review of a latest generation video card. To us, it is as important to know the performance of a video card with the latest games as it is to know its performance in an older game. That’s why we kept this software in our methodology.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 13.01% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 15.58% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 30.20% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory) , while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E, which was 40.84% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 39.16% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 33.82% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 31.55% faster , nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 28.83% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 24.27% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 22.96% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 22.88% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 21.62% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 21.20% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 20.72% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 14.06% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 9.47% faster and ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 6.60% faster.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 22.75% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 24.15% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 47.77% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 50.30% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E, which was 49.09% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 43.57% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 41.23% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 39.07% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 31.71% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 30.79% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 29.20% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 26.16% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 21.49% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 20.77% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 19.67% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 12.32% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 10.48% faster.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 31.77% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 46.84% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 77.40% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 67.43% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 62.37% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 59.07% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 54.06% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 51.96% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 40.60% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 38.98% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 38.08% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 30.05% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 29.83% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 21.31% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 19.33% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 14.72% faster and Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 6.74% faster.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 21.64% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 32.40% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 43.98% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 75.81% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 72.60% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 66.41% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 62.49% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 55.11% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 45.39% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 43.63% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 42.59% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 42.41% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 39.83% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 38.80% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 37.72% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 33.20% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 15.35% faster.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 24.30% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 42.09% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 49.35% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 125.18% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 114.62% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 109.76% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 99.19% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 89.67% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 86.81% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 75.88% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 75.45% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 60.94% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 58.87% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT,O, which was 58.84% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 55.93% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 43.85% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 22.01% faster.

Radeon X1900 XTX

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was 46.63% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 62.78% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 100.19% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro. Keep in mind that XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB was running at 400 MHz (core) and 800 MHz (memory), while its rival, Albatron GeForce 6600, was running at 300 MHz (core) and 500 MHz (memory).

 XFX GeForce 6600 256 MB (which is factory-overclocked) was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 246.75% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 212.42% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 210.77% faster, ATI Radeon X1900 XTX, which was 201.59% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 194.46% faster, NVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 176.37% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 126.74% faster, NVidia GeForce 6800 GS, which was 123.56% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, which was 113.28% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 104.31% faster, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 81.23% faster, ATI Radeon X1600 XT, which was 61.57% faster, HIS Radeon X1600 XT, which was 55.88% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 26.89% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (0)

Related Content
  • XFX Xgear Dual Reflex Controller Review
  • MSI Overclocked GeForce 8600 GTS Review
  • EVGA nForce 780i SLI Motherboard
  • XFX Radeon HD 5770 Video Card Review
  • XFX 750 W Black Edition Power Supply Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    EVGA 01G-P3-N981-TREVGA 01G-P3-N981-TR

    eVGA GeForce 9800 GT Video Card and other Video Cards at CDW.com 01G-P3-N981-TR

    CDW: $165.99 CompUSA: $139.99
    TigerDirect: $139.99 ZipZoomFly: $142.99

    RSSLatest News
    Arctic Cooling Intros Cooler for Radeon HD 5970 and HD 5870
    March 12, 2010 - 11:19 AM PST
    OCZ Announces 32 GB Onyx SSD Unit
    March 10, 2010 - 3:08 PM PST
    MSI Launches X-Slim X360 Laptop
    March 9, 2010 - 3:15 PM PST
    Spire Launches TherMax Eclipse II CPU Cooler
    March 8, 2010 - 1:59 PM PST
    Sparkle Gives 3D Glasses with GeForce GT 240 Video Cards
    March 5, 2010 - 11:28 AM PST
    Corsair Launches Force SSD Drive
    March 4, 2010 - 7:17 AM PST
    Kingston Announces HyperX LoVo DDR3 Memory Kits
    March 3, 2010 - 8:07 PM PST
    Mushkin Intros Ridgeback Memory Series
    March 3, 2010 - 7:54 PM PST
    Thermaltake Launches Frio CPU Cooler
    March 3, 2010 - 3:45 PM PST
    AMD Unveils 890GX Chipset
    March 2, 2010 - 2:25 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    OCZ Z Series 850 W Power Supply Review
    HIS Radeon HD 5570 Fan Video Card Review
    Core i7-980X CPU Review
    Gelid Tranquillo CPU Cooler Review
    How to Discover Your Power Supply Real Manufacturer
    OCZ Z Series 1000 W Power Supply Review
    Amacrox Free Earth 85PLUS 650 W Power Supply Review
    ECS A890GXM-A Motherboard
    ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 Motherboard Review
    PC Power Supply Protections: They Won’t Always Protect You
    Huntkey Balance King 4500 450 W Power Supply Review
    Four Tech Movies Every IT Pro Should See
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    JVC Picsio GC-FM1 Camcorder Review
    OCZ ModXStream Pro 600 W Power Supply Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,149,694 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    811,767 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    740,098 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    668,404 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    621,766 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    607,252 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    505,644 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    493,425 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    440,651 views
    Understanding RAM Timings
    378,864 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Gpu Fans.....
    by Cold_Reborn
    PSU for new set up
    by andeggs
    PSU Wattage and Choice Help
    by Wolfgang
    OCZ Z Series 850 W Power Supply Review
    by Korot
    OCZ Z Series 1000 W Power Supply Review
    by Gabriel Torres
    rosewill libertas lib-800 review
    by nubjub
    Arctic Cooling Intros Cooler for Radeon HD 5970 and HD 5870
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    TV or Monitor
    by Olle P
    Lower power PSU recommendations
    by Olle P
    HIS Radeon HD 5570 Fan Video Card Review
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-10, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)