| Leadtek GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit Review |
|
|
| $ Check REAL-TIME pricing for VisionTek RADEON HD 4850, (512 MB) PCI Express Video Card $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3DMark05 |
3DMark05 measures performance by simulating DirectX 9.0c games, i.e. using the new Shader 3.0 model. This programming model is used by Far Cry game and other games to be launched in the future. This new programming model is used by GeForce 6 and 7 series from nVidia and Radeon X1000 series from ATI.
In this software we ran two tests, both at 1024x768x32. Since we were evaluating low-end video cards, we decided to not run our tests in higher resolutions, since rarely a user that buys a video card from this level will push resolutions above 1024x768 in 3D games.
We ran this software first without antialiasing and with no anisotropic filtering, and then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and anisotropic filtering at 4 samples. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our benchmark, allowing direct comparison between them. Also, some very low-end video chips (Volari 8300 and Intel i915G) don’t have antialiasing feature, so we were not able to benchmark them using this configuration.

At the default 3DMark05 configuration, Leadtek GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit was 15.85% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit (XFX), 38.42% faster than Radeon X300 128 MB 128-bit (ATI), 38.92% faster than Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB 64-bit (PowerColor), 52.67% faster than Volari 8300 128 MB (XGI), 58.32% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 16 MB 32-bit (Leadtek) and 345.66% faster than i915G (Intel D915GEV).
Leadtek GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit was beaten by GeForce 6600 GT 128 MB (nVidia), which was 132.43% faster, Radeon X1300 Pro 256 MB 128-bit (ATI), which was 81.97% faster and GeForce 6600 128 MB (Albatron), which was 36.51% faster.

Enabling video quality enhancements, Leadtek GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit was 46.72% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit (XFX), 60.06% faster than Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB 64-bit (PowerColor), 60.94% faster than Radeon X300 128 MB 128-bit (ATI) and 114.00% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 16 MB 32-bit (Leadtek).
Leadtek GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit was beaten by GeForce 6600 GT 128 MB (nVidia), which was 122.98% faster, Radeon X1300 Pro 256 MB 128-bit (ATI), which was 106.20% faster and GeForce 6600 128 MB (Albatron), which was 35.89% faster.
|
| Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 » |
| Print Version | Send to Friend |
|
Bookmark Article
| Comments (0)
|
|
| Recommended Deals |  | ATI RADEON® 9550, (256 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | eVGA e-GeForce® 7600 GT, (512 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | PNY GeForce® 7600 GS, (512 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | PNY GeForce® 8600 GT, (256 MB) PCI Express Video Card
|  | eVGA e-GeForce FX 5500, (256 MB) AGP Video Card
|
|
Latest News |
September 5, 2008 - 7:28 AM PST |
September 4, 2008 - 10:59 AM PST |
September 3, 2008 - 7:54 AM PST |
September 2, 2008 - 7:55 AM PST |
September 1, 2008 - 11:16 AM PST |
September 1, 2008 - 10:24 AM PST |
August 29, 2008 - 9:24 AM PST |
August 28, 2008 - 11:43 AM PST |
August 28, 2008 - 11:13 AM PST |
August 28, 2008 - 10:39 AM PST |
| .:: More News ::. |
|
Latest Content |
|
|
| Our Most Popular Articles |
772,533 views
|
480,554 views
|
425,796 views
|
413,945 views
|
408,703 views
|
385,447 views
|
348,000 views
|
333,251 views
|
280,176 views
|
270,379 views
|
|
| Latest Threads in Our Forums |
by Hardware Secrets Team |
by rajani1983 |
by yapyap |
by tomahawk 1705 |
by BedCommando |
by jedsky |
by Wall'E |
by Gabriel Torres |
by Gabriel Torres |
by Hardware Secrets Team |
| .:: Visit Our Forums ::. |
|
|