Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
First Look
Gabriel’s Blog
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Manufacturer Finder
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Subscribe today!
PCI Express System Architecture
PCI Express System Architecture, by Tom Shanley (Addison-Wesley Professional), starting at $13.78
Home » Video
PowerColor Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB Review
Author: Gabriel Torres 221,392 views
Type: Reviews Last Updated: December 2, 2005
Page: 1 of 10

Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is an entry-level graphics chip from ATI for the PCI Express bus, competing directly with GeForce 6200 TurboCache from NVIDIA, even though a new model has just enterered the market, Radeon X1300 series, which should heat the battle in the entry-level VGA arena. In this review we will compare the performance of Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory with 128 MB (”256 MB“) from PowerColor with the standard Radeon X300 (not ”SE“ and not ”HyperMemory“) and GeForce 6200 models, and also with some mid-range chips (GeForce 6600 and GeForce 6600 GT).

PowerColor Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
click to enlarge
Figure 1: PowerColor Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB.

HyperMemory (”HM“) is a technology that simulates a 256 MB video card by using part of the system’s RAM memory as video memory: 256 MB HyperMemory video cards have 128 MB of video memory and ”steal“ 128 MB from the main system RAM. TurboCache technology from NVIDIA uses the same idea. Read our tutorial on HyperMemory for more information on this subject.

The good thing for the consumer is that ATI does not allow partners to use different memory configurations. On NVIDIA side, you can find GeForce 6200 TurboCache with different memory capacities and memory interface width, causing a great deal of confusion on consumers, especially when we are talking about a very entry-level video card that is not targeted to techie folks that know what clock and number of bits are.

On ATI side, all cards marked as ”SE“ use a 64-bit memory interface, so compared to the standard Radeon X300, Radeon X300 SE achieve half the memory bandwidth, since they run at the same clock rate: both run at 325 MHz and access memory at 400 MHz.

We run PowerStrip software to check the clocks used by the reviewed card, and the model we reviewed was really running at these clock rates.

You can see in our tutorial ”ATI Chips Comparison Table“ the difference between Radeon 300 SE HyperMemory chip and the other chips from ATI, while on our tutorial ”NVIDIA Chips Comparison Table“ you can compare it to its competitors from NVIDIA.

Let’s now take a closer look at the Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory from PowerColor.

Print Version | Send to Friend | Bookmark Article Page 1 of 10  | Next »

Related Content
  • TurboCache and HyperMemory
  • AMD ATI Radeon Chips Comparison Table
  • XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit Review
  • Leadtek GeForce 6200 TurboCache 16 MB 32-bit Review
  • XGI Volari 8300 128 MB 64-bit Review

  • RSSLatest Content
    ASRock FM2A88X-ITX+ Motherboard
    April 27, 2015 - 2:40 AM
    GeForce GTX TITAN X Video Card Review
    April 22, 2015 - 4:00 AM
    A10-7800 CPU Review
    April 6, 2015 - 2:50 AM
    Samsung Galaxy A5 Smartphone Review
    March 31, 2015 - 2:47 AM
    A10-6800K vs. Core i3-4150 CPU Review
    March 25, 2015 - 3:15 AM
    Core i7-5960X CPU Review
    February 24, 2015 - 3:00 AM

    2004-15 Clube do Hardware, all rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)