| XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit Review |
|
|
| $ Check REAL-TIME pricing for VisionTek RADEON HD 4850, (512 MB) PCI Express Video Card $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3DMark03 |
3DMark03 measures performance by simulating games written to DirectX 9, which are contemporary games. In this software we ran two tests, both at 1024x768x32. Since we were evaluating low-end video cards, we decided to not run our tests in higher resolutions, since rarely a user that buys a video card from this level will push resolutions above 1024x768 in 3D games.
We ran this software first without antialiasing and with no anisotropic filtering, and then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and anisotropic filtering at 4 samples. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our benchmark, allowing direct comparison between them. Also, some very low-end video chips (Volari 8300 and Intel i915G) don’t have antialiasing feature, so we were not able to benchmark them using this configuration.

At the default 3DMark03 configuration, XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit was 13.41% faster than Volari 8300 128 MB (XGI), 23.38% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 16 MB 32-bit (Leadtek), 36.03% faster than Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB 64-bit (PowerColor), 36.03% faster than Radeon X300 128 MB 128-bit (ATI) and 74.77% faster than i915G (Intel D915GEV).
XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit was beaten by GeForce 6600 GT 128 MB (nVidia), which was 228.95% faster, Radeon X1300 Pro 256 MB 128-bit (ATI), which was 129.59% faster, GeForce 6600 128 MB (Albatron), which was 102.73% faster and GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit (Leadtek), which was 56.04% faster.

Enabling video quality enhancements, XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit achived similar perfomace to Radeon X300 128 MB 128-bit (ATI) and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB 64-bit (PowerColor), and it was was 79.09% faster than GeForce 6200 TurboCache 16 MB 32-bit (Leadtek).
XFX GeForce 6200 TurboCache 64 MB 64-bit was beaten by GeForce 6600 GT 128 MB (nVidia), which was 438.96% faster, Radeon X1300 Pro 256 MB 128-bit (ATI), which was 277.92% faster, GeForce 6600 128 MB (Albatron), which was 198.84% faster and GeForce 6200 128 MB 128-bit (Leadtek), which was 107.63% faster.
|
| Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 » |
| Print Version | Send to Friend |
|
Bookmark Article
| Comments (0)
|
|
| Recommended Deals |  | ATI RADEON® X1300 PRO, (256 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | ATI ALL-IN-WONDER 9600, (128 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | eVGA GeForce FX 5200, (128 MB) AGP Video Card
|  | ATI RADEON® 9600 Pro, (256 MB) AGP Video Card
|
|
Latest News |
October 10, 2008 - 10:57 AM PST |
October 9, 2008 - 10:13 AM PST |
October 8, 2008 - 11:18 AM PST |
October 7, 2008 - 10:42 AM PST |
October 7, 2008 - 10:11 AM PST |
October 6, 2008 - 11:10 AM PST |
October 3, 2008 - 11:50 AM PST |
October 3, 2008 - 11:28 AM PST |
October 3, 2008 - 11:17 AM PST |
October 3, 2008 - 11:07 AM PST |
| .:: More News ::. |
|
Latest Content |
|
|
| Our Most Popular Articles |
796,575 views
|
495,703 views
|
438,156 views
|
421,057 views
|
415,093 views
|
407,406 views
|
365,423 views
|
349,890 views
|
284,628 views
|
275,610 views
|
|
| Latest Threads in Our Forums |
by Cheetos |
by Micromancer |
by GreyCricket |
by EliteKiller |
by ianb |
by AeroWB |
by AeroWB |
by AeroWB |
by trojancya |
by trojancya |
| .:: Visit Our Forums ::. |
|
|