Far Cry is a game based on the new Shader 3.0 (DirectX 9.0c) programming model available on series 6 and 7 from NVIDIA and series X1000 from ATI graphics chips. We’ve updated the game to version 1.3.
 
As we’ve done on other programs, we ran this game at three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32. This game allows several image quality levels and we’ve done our benchmarking on two levels, low and very high. To measure the performance we used the demo created by German magazine PC Games Hardware (PCGH), available at http://www.3dcenter.org/downloads/farcry-pcgh-vga.php. We run this demo four times and made an arithmetical average with the results. This average is the result presented in our graphs.

This game has a very important detail in its image quality configuration. Antialiasing, instead of being configured by numbers (1x, 2x, 4x or 6x) is configured as low, medium or high. The problem is that on NVIDIA chips both medium and high mean 4x, while on ATI chips medium means 2x and high means 6x, making the comparison between ATI and NVIDIA chips completely unfair. Because of that we configured antialising at 4x and anisotropic filtering at 8x manually at the video driver control panel.

For further details on how to measure 3D performance with Far Cry, read our tutorial on this subject.

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 5.66% faster than MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, 6.24% faster than XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, 7.02% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT, 8.78% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 10.60% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 10.72% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 16.84% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 19.78% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT and 28.34% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., HIS Radeon X800 GTO, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, ATI Radeon X1800 XL and ATI Radeon X1600 XT.

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 6.42% faster than MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, 6.69% faster than XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, 7.63% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT, 11.06% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT, 11.11% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 11.47% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 59.07% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 61.48% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 94.39% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO achieved a performance similar to ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., HIS Radeon X800 GT, HIS Radeon X800 GTO, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, ATI Radeon X1600 XT and Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro.

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 5.87% faster than MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, 6.29% faster than XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, 6.46% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT, 10.50% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 11.09% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT, 16.28% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 17.17% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 29.73% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 34.76% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 123.75% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 137.03% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 190.26% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO achieved a performance similar to ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., ATI Radeon X1800 XT, ATI Radeon X1800 XL and HIS Radeon X800 GTO.

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 10.24% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GTO, 24.28% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 26.52% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 44.77% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 70.33% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 81.19% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 193.03% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 239.83% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro and 270.12% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO achieved a performance similar to NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was beaten by ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E.,  which was 10.45% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL,  which was 10.37% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT,  which was 9.83% faster, NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT,  which was 9.31% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 8.68% faster and XFX GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 8.68% faster.

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 13.30% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GTO, 30.08% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 35.02% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 45.80% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 84.01% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 100.97% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 244.33% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 266.71% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro and 280.98% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO achieved a performance similar to NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT,  which was 45.08% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 39.99% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 37.08% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL,  which was 34.90% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E.,  which was 30.91% faster and NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT,  which was 29.29% faster.

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was 15.09% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GTO, 14.32% faster than NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT, 39.45% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 41.31% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 59.93% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 95.90% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 100.72% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 247.52% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 387.56% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro and 459.20% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

GeCube Radeon X800 GTO was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT,  which was 83.37% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 54.46% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL,  which was 51.43% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX,  which was 48.21% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E.,  which was 38.34% faster and NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT,  which was 33.55% faster.