Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods, by Jon Phillips (Que), starting at $29.99
Home » Video
ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: October 7, 2005
Page: 8 of 10
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for eVGA GeForce GTX 275 Video Card and other Cards at CDW.com 896-P3-1170-AR $.
CDW: $279.99 Dell Home: $279.99
Newegg: $254.99 PCRush: $253.93

Doom 3
Doom 3 is one of the heaviest games available today. As we’ve done on other programs, we ran this game at three resolutions: 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32. This game allows several image quality levels and we’ve done our benchmarking on two levels, low and high. We ran demo1 four times and wrote the obtained number of frames per second. The first result we discarded at once, since it is far inferior than the other results. This happens because at the first time we run the demo the game must load all textures to video memory, fact that doesn’t happen from the second time we run the demo on. From the three results left, we consider as our official result the middle result, i.e. we discard the highest and the lowest values. Curiously almost all times the values obtained at the second round on were the same.

A very important detail that we must mention is that Doom 3 has an internal FPS lock: it is only capable of generating 60 frames per second, even if your board is able to produce more frames per second than that. This is done in order to make the game to have the same "playability" sensation independently from the video card installed on the PC. This lock, however, is disabled in the game benchmarking mode.

For further details on how to measure 3D performance with Doom 3, read our tutorial on this subject.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 19.78% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 23.11% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 115.53% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 164.29% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 43.99% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 41.89% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 41.29% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 41.29% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 40.24% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 26.88% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 25.83% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 24.17% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 13.96% faster, PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, which was 4.65% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 4.65% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 19.84% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 22.13% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 128.06% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 179.38% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 104.47% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 102.46% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 102.24% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 95.75% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 80.76% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 71.36% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 69.57% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 39.82% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 34.00% faster, PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, which was 6.26% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 4.70% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 19.62% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 24.31% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 141.98% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 199.06% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT and HIS Radeon X800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 158.99% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 154.89% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 144.48% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 140.38% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 103.15% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 99.05% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 96.85% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 44.79% faster and GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 41.64% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 21.03% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 25.26% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 119.42% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 166.38% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
 
ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 56.23% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 54.75% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 53.77% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 53.44% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 51.15% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 37.05% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 33.93% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 31.48% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 16.07% faster, PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, which was 8.36% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 7.38% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 21.22% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 24.85% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 126.63% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 178.00% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 116.31% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 114.63% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 112.71% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 107.91% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 87.53% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 78.42% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 73.62% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 43.88% faster, XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 33.09% faster, PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, which was 8.15% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 6.47% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 21.60% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 26.14% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 162.07% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 195.15% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT and HIS Radeon X800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 165.79% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 162.83% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 149.34% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 147.37% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 101.97% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 100.99% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 98.36% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 43.09% faster and XFX GeForce 6600 GT, which was 42.76% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (4)

Related Content
  • AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
  • HIS Radeon X1600 XT Review
  • HIS Radeon X1600 Pro AGP Review
  • PowerColor Radeon X1600 Pro 512 MB Review
  • Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT Ultimate Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    GeForce GTX XLR8 9800GTX 512MB GDDR3 GTX43PNY XLR8 GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card and other Cards at CDW.com VCG98GTXPXPB


    CDW: $136.99 TheNerds: $135.99
    Newegg: $129.99 CircuitCity: $129.99

    RSSLatest News
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    November 6, 2009 - 3:07 PM PST
    Mushkin Launches Memories with Copper-made Heatsink
    November 5, 2009 - 3:49 PM PST
    Super Talent Launches USB 3.0 Flash Memories
    November 5, 2009 - 3:47 PM PST
    VIA Announces Nano 3000 Processor Series
    November 5, 2009 - 3:42 PM PST
    Sapphire Announces Vapor-X HD 5870 and HD 5750 Video Cards
    November 5, 2009 - 3:38 PM PST
    Gelid Unveils Tranquillo CPU Cooler
    November 5, 2009 - 3:36 PM PST
    Noctua Intros NH-D14 Premium CPU Cooler
    November 3, 2009 - 8:14 PM PST
    Transcend Unveils DDR3-1333 Memory Kits
    November 3, 2009 - 7:57 PM PST
    EVGA Launches GeForce GTX 275 CO-OP PhysX Edition
    November 3, 2009 - 7:51 PM PST
    Akasa Launches Freedom Xone Mid-tower Case
    November 2, 2009 - 6:05 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    NZXT Gamma Case Review
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    ASUS U-75HA 750 W Power Supply Review
    MSI P55-GD80 Motherboard
    Thermaltake Element V Case Review
    Nokia 7705 Twist Cell Phone Review
    Cooler Master Hyper TX3 CPU Cooler Review
    Some Pictures from Our Office
    Antec Two Hundred Case Review
    Corsair TX950W Power Supply Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5770 Video Card Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5750 Video Card Review
    Scythe Big Shuriken CPU Cooler Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,070,345 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    694,558 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    671,140 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    585,444 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    555,663 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    553,912 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    485,715 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    474,744 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    389,109 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    336,470 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Is it a vga problem or motherboard has shocked?
    by ftomsuk
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    by cchjde
    Is it possible LCD Monitor leaked by itself ?
    by delta32
    Suddenly death syndrome and pendrives
    by Desert Fox
    better cpu cooler?
    by sam_wade07
    Video Transfer camcorder to PC
    by fjs559
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    by Merman
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    by Olle P
    Understanding Over Current Protection
    by Olle P
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)