Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods
Maximum PC Guide to Extreme PC Mods, by Jon Phillips (Que), starting at $29.99
Home » Video
ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: October 7, 2005
Page: 5 of 10
$ Check REAL-TIME pricing for eVGA GeForce GTX 275 Video Card and other Cards at CDW.com 896-P3-1170-AR $.
CDW: $279.99 Dell Home: $279.99
Newegg: $254.99 PCRush: $253.93

3DMark2001 SE

3DMark2001 SE measures video card performance simulating DirectX 8.1 games. It is very effective software for evaluating the performance from previous-generation games, programmed using DirectX 8. In this software we run six tests. We run the software in three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32, first without antialiasing and with no frame buffer, then we put the antialiasing at 4 samples and the frame buffer at triple-buffering. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our bechmarks, allowing direct comparison between them.

You may be asking yourself why we added an old program in a review of a latest generation  video card. To us, it is as important to know the performance of a video card with the latest games as it is to know its performance in an older game. That’s why we kept this software in our methodology.

Radeon X1000 Series


At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 6.63% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 11.10% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 14.74% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 37.45% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 40.57% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 58.35% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which  was 15.80% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which  was 14.43% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which  was 10.03% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which  was 8.17% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which  was 5.95% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which  was 5.93% faster, and GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which  was 3.82% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 6.87% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 8.17% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 9.97% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 49.13% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 50.83% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 79.53% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 23.72% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 22.72% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 18.18% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 17.94% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 16.25% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 14.47% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 8.42% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 8.40% faster, and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 6.35% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 5.75% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 13.66% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 59.85% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 78.14% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 115.20% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 38.02% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 33.84% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 31.12% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 30.52% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 26.99% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 25.27% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 15.90% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 13.88% faster and HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 7.02% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 6.92% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 8.94% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 23.46% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 73.22% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 88.55%  faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 105.04% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to nVidia GeForce 6800 GT and HIS Radeon X800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 23.46% faster than, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 21.20% faster than, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 17.75% faster than, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 16.85% faster than, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 14.10% faster than, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 8.92% faster than and GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 3.63% faster than.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 11.88% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 31.91% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 100.04% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, 128.68% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600 and 140.36% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT achieved a performance similar to HIS Radeon X800 GT and PowerColor Radeon X800 GT.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 39.91% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 33.36% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 30.33% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 26.17% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 23.76% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 17.85% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 9.28% faster and GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 6.48% faster.

Radeon X1000 Series

At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1600 XT was 27.33% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 136.90% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 163.00% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 223.45% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

ATI Radeon X1600 XT was beaten by ATI Radeon X1800 XT, which was 114.62% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 93.37% faster, ATI Radeon X1800 XL, which was 92.35% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 85.82% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 82.25% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 71.05% faster, GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), which was 44.42% faster, nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 40.34% faster, PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, which was 28.92% faster, HIS Radeon X800 GT, which was 26.46% faster and Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, which was 12.17% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (4)

Related Content
  • AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
  • HIS Radeon X1600 XT Review
  • HIS Radeon X1600 Pro AGP Review
  • PowerColor Radeon X1600 Pro 512 MB Review
  • Sapphire Radeon X1600 XT Ultimate Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    GeForce GTX XLR8 9800GTX 512MB GDDR3 GTX43PNY XLR8 GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card and other Cards at CDW.com VCG98GTXPXPB


    CDW: $136.99 TheNerds: $135.99
    Newegg: $129.99 CircuitCity: $129.99

    RSSLatest News
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    November 6, 2009 - 3:07 PM PST
    Mushkin Launches Memories with Copper-made Heatsink
    November 5, 2009 - 3:49 PM PST
    Super Talent Launches USB 3.0 Flash Memories
    November 5, 2009 - 3:47 PM PST
    VIA Announces Nano 3000 Processor Series
    November 5, 2009 - 3:42 PM PST
    Sapphire Announces Vapor-X HD 5870 and HD 5750 Video Cards
    November 5, 2009 - 3:38 PM PST
    Gelid Unveils Tranquillo CPU Cooler
    November 5, 2009 - 3:36 PM PST
    Noctua Intros NH-D14 Premium CPU Cooler
    November 3, 2009 - 8:14 PM PST
    Transcend Unveils DDR3-1333 Memory Kits
    November 3, 2009 - 7:57 PM PST
    EVGA Launches GeForce GTX 275 CO-OP PhysX Edition
    November 3, 2009 - 7:51 PM PST
    Akasa Launches Freedom Xone Mid-tower Case
    November 2, 2009 - 6:05 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    NZXT Gamma Case Review
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    ASUS U-75HA 750 W Power Supply Review
    MSI P55-GD80 Motherboard
    Thermaltake Element V Case Review
    Nokia 7705 Twist Cell Phone Review
    Cooler Master Hyper TX3 CPU Cooler Review
    Some Pictures from Our Office
    Antec Two Hundred Case Review
    Corsair TX950W Power Supply Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5770 Video Card Review
    XFX Radeon HD 5750 Video Card Review
    Scythe Big Shuriken CPU Cooler Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,070,341 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    694,548 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    671,138 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    585,439 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    555,659 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    553,912 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    485,713 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    474,742 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    389,108 views
    Sempron vs. Athlon XP
    336,469 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Is it a vga problem or motherboard has shocked?
    by ftomsuk
    Patriot Box Office Media Player Review
    by cchjde
    Is it possible LCD Monitor leaked by itself ?
    by delta32
    Suddenly death syndrome and pendrives
    by Desert Fox
    better cpu cooler?
    by sam_wade07
    Video Transfer camcorder to PC
    by fjs559
    Spire Announces CoolNess Laptop Cooler
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Can We Trust the 80 Plus Certification?
    by Merman
    SilverStone Grandia GD04 Case Review
    by Olle P
    Understanding Over Current Protection
    by Olle P
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-9, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)