Doom 3 is one of the heaviest games available today. As we’ve done on other programs, we ran this game at three resolutions: 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32. This game allows several image quality levels and we’ve done our benchmarking on two levels, low and high. We ran demo1 four times and wrote the obtained number of frames per second. The first result we discarded at once, since it is far inferior than the other results. This happens because at the first time we run the demo the game must load all textures to video memory, fact that doesn’t happen from the second time we run the demo on. From the three results left, we consider as our official result the middle result, i.e. we discard the highest and the lowest values. Curiously almost all times the values obtained at the second round on were the same.
A very important detail that we must mention is that Doom 3 has an internal FPS lock: it is only capable of generating 60 frames per second, even if your board is able to produce more frames per second than that. This is done in order to make the game to have the same "playability" sensation independently from the video card installed on the PC. This lock, however, is disabled in the game benchmarking mode.
For further details on how to measure 3D performance with Doom 3, read our tutorial on this subject.
At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 13.49% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 14.44% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 15.96% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 26.35% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 37.59% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 37.59% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 43.99% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 72.48% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 77.26% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 210.36% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 280.56% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, ATI Radeon X1800 XL and XFX GeForce 7800 GTX.
At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 4.46% faster than nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, 13.12% faster than ATI Radeon X1800 XL, 19.32% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 20.58% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 46.24% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 52.59% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 92.42% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 95.30% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 104.47% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 145.04% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 149.73% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 366.33% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 471.25% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to XFX GeForce 7800 GTX and MSI GeForce 7800 GTX.
At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 20.34% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 22.82% faster than ATI Radeon X1800 XL, 24.20% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 68.85% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 72.61% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 143.71% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 144.48% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 146.03% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 192.45% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 203.92% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 491.60% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 631.13% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to nVidia GeForce 7800 GT.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT was beaten by XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 5.94% faster and MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 4.26% faster.
At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 3.36% faster than ATI Radeon X1800 XL, 14.00% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 16.65% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 18.83% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 34.60% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 44.18% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 45.50% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 56.23% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT.89.09% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 95.69% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 242.81% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 316.16% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX and MSI GeForce 7800 GTX.
At a resolution of 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 4.04% faster than nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, 15.35% faster than ATI Radeon X1800 XL, 21.24% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 24.59% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 50.33% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 62.52% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 100.00% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 103.15% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 116.31% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 162.21% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 170.06% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 390.22% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 501.33% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to XFX GeForce 7800 GTX and MSI GeForce 7800 GTX.
At a resolution of 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements, ATI Radeon X1800 XT was 23.45% faster than ATI Radeon X1800 XL, 24.06% faster than nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, 25.70% faster than ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., 74.25% faster than GeCube Radeon X800 GTO (which is factory-overclocked), 74.65% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 146.10% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 148.52% faster than HIS Radeon X800 GT, 149.34% faster than ATI Radeon X1600 XT, 203.20% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 214.52% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 553.45% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT and 635.92% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT achieved a performance similar to nVidia GeForce 7800 GT.
ATI Radeon X1800 XT was beaten by XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 6.60% faster and MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 5.41% faster.
