Hardware Secrets
Home | Camera | Case | CE | Cooling | CPU | Input | Memory | Mobile | Motherboard | Networking | Power | Storage | Video | Other
Content
Articles
First Look
Gabriel's Blog
News
Reviews
Tutorials
Main Menu
About Us
Awarded Products
Compare Prices
Datasheets
Dictionary
Download
Drivers
Forums
Links
Manufacturer Finder
Newsletter
On The Web
RSS Feed
Test Your Skills
Twitter
Newsletter
Subscribe today!
Search




Recommended
PCI Express System Architecture
PCI Express System Architecture, by Tom Shanley (Addison-Wesley Professional), starting at $40.70
Home » Video
HIS Radeon X800 GT IceQ II Review
Author: Gabriel Torres and Cássio Lima
Type: Reviews Last Updated: September 14, 2005
Page: 7 of 10
Real-time pricing for EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR.
EVGA 012-P3-1178-TR GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition Video Card - 1280MB 448 192-bit PCI Express 2.0 x16 SLI Ready Dual DVI HDMI w/ Adapter Built-in GTS 250 PhysX processor CO-OP 012-P3-1178-TR
TigerDirect: $349.99 ZipZoomFly: $353.99
CompUSA: $349.99 CircuitCity: $349.99

3DMark05

3DMark05 measures performance by simulating DirectX 9.0c games, i.e. using the new Shader 3.0 model. This programming model is used by Far Cry game and other games to be launched in the future. This new programming model is used by GeForce 6 and 7 series from nVidia and Radeon X1000 series from ATI.

We run this program in three resolutions, 1024x768x32, 1280x1024x32 and 1600x1200x32, first without antialiasing and anisotropic filtering, and then configuring antialising at 4x and anisotropic filtering also at 4x. This improves the video quality but lowers the performance. We were willing to see how much performance we lost by putting the VGA to run at the maximum possible image quality. It is important to notice that ATI chips can run at 6x antialiasing. Since nVidia chips cannot run at this configuration, we had to use 4x antialiasing to use a configuration that is valid to all video cards included in our benchmark, allowing direct comparison between them.

Radeon X800 GT

At a resolution of 1024x768 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X800 GT was 5.58% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 38.36% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 39.03% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 134.74% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 178.65% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT, and 192.53% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 76.41% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 74.23% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 70.02% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 58.85% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 43.55% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 13.62% faster.

Radeon X800 GT

At a resolution of 1280x1024 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X800 GT was 5.07% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 41.68% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 63.11% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 153.53% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 206.92% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro, and 221.77% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 101.88% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 96.68% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 90.07% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 72.43% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 48.50% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 17.32% faster.

Radeon X800 GT

At a resolution of 1600x1200 without any image quality enhancement, HIS Radeon X800 GT was 35.83% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 92.25% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 157.42% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, 198.53% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro, and 243.22% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 137.78% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 130.04% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 121.03% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 96.95% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 61.77% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 27.20% faster.

Radeon X800 GT

At a resolution of 1024x768 enabling image quality enhancements, HIS Radeon X800 GT was 9.96% faster than PowerColor Radeon X800 GT, 57.84% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 173.74% faster than XFX GeForce 6600 GT, 239.40% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro, 276.79% faster than Albatron GeForce 6600, and 290.14% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 81.98% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 78.17% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 71.79% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 57.79% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 41.10% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 5.02% faster.

Radeon X800 GT

To run at 1280x1024 enabling image quality enhancements on 3DMark05 the video card must have at least 256 MB of memory, because of that some video cards couldn’t run this test. Here HIS Radeon X800 GT was 45.76% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 212.58% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro and 332.01% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 123.19% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 115.50% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 106.61% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 85.82% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 60.48% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 18.29% faster.

Radeon X800 GT

To run at 1600x1200 enabling image quality enhancements on 3DMark05 the video card must have at least 256 MB of memory, because of that some video cards couldn’t run this test. Here HIS Radeon X800 GT was 41.78% faster than Sapphire Radeon X700 Pro, 230.73% faster than Sapphire Radeon X600 Pro and 471.26% faster than ATI Radeon X600 XT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT achieved a performance similar to PowerColor Radeon X800 GT.

HIS Radeon X800 GT was beaten by MSI - DOT GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 125.98% faster, XFX GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 122.28% faster, MSI GeForce 7800 GTX, which was 113.96% faster, nVidia GeForce 7800 GT, which was 92.30% faster, ATI Radeon X850 XT P.E., which was 70.69% faster, and nVidia GeForce 6800 GT, which was 14.63% faster.

Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 »
Print Version | Send to Friend | | Bookmark Article | Comments (0)

Related Content
  • Transforming your Radeon 9800 Pro into a Radeon 9800 XT
  • TurboCache and HyperMemory
  • PowerColor Radeon X800 GT Review
  • GeCube Overclocked Radeon X800 GTO Review
  • PowerColor Radeon X1950 Pro Extreme with Arctic Cooling System Review

  • Recommended Deal.
    XFX PVT98GYDLHXFX PVT98GYDLH

    XFX PVT98GYDLH Geforce 512 MB 9800 GT DDR3 Graphics Card Electronics XFX PVT98GYDLH Geforce 512 MB 9800 GT DDR3 Graphics Card PVT98GYDLH PVT98GYDLH

    Amazon: $104.99 CircuitCity: $104.99
    RitzCamera: $121.79 Buy.com: $108.99

    RSSLatest News
    Sparkle Announces 2 GB GeForce GT 220 Video Card
    March 19, 2010 - 10:17 AM PST
    PowerColor Launches HD 5770 Eyefinity 5 Video Card
    March 19, 2010 - 9:59 AM PST
    In Win Intros IRONCLAD Mid-Tower Case
    March 19, 2010 - 9:39 AM PST
    A-Data Intros 8 GB DDR3 Memory Kit
    March 17, 2010 - 3:40 PM PST
    Intel Launches Xeon 5600 Series and Core i7-980X Processor
    March 16, 2010 - 3:46 PM PST
    Intel Launches 40 GB X25-V SSD Drive
    March 15, 2010 - 1:43 PM PST
    Arctic Cooling Intros Cooler for Radeon HD 5970 and HD 5870
    March 12, 2010 - 12:19 PM PST
    OCZ Announces 32 GB Onyx SSD Unit
    March 10, 2010 - 4:08 PM PST
    MSI Launches X-Slim X360 Laptop
    March 9, 2010 - 4:15 PM PST
    Spire Launches TherMax Eclipse II CPU Cooler
    March 8, 2010 - 2:59 PM PST
    .:: More News ::.

    RSSLatest Content
    All Mobile Celeron Models
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer Review
    All Core i5 Models
    Mionix Naos 5000 Mouse Review
    Arctic Cooling E361-WM Earphones Review
    Don’t Let Your IT Projects Become Vaporware
    OCZ Z Series 850 W Power Supply Review
    HIS Radeon HD 5570 Fan Video Card Review
    Core i7-980X CPU Review
    Gelid Tranquillo CPU Cooler Review
    How to Discover Your Power Supply Real Manufacturer
    OCZ Z Series 1000 W Power Supply Review
    Amacrox Free Earth 85PLUS 650 W Power Supply Review
    ECS A890GXM-A Motherboard
    ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 Motherboard Review

    Our Most Popular Articles
    Maximum CPU Temperature
    1,155,842 views
    How to Find Out Your Motherboard Manufacturer and Model
    818,805 views
    nVidia Chips Comparison Table
    743,723 views
    Connecting Two PCs Using a USB-USB Cable
    673,192 views
    How To Correctly Apply Thermal Grease
    626,026 views
    AMD ATI Chips Comparison Table
    610,439 views
    ATI Radeon X1300 Pro Review
    506,851 views
    ATI Radeon X1600 XT Review
    494,522 views
    How To Perform a BIOS Upgrade
    443,933 views
    Understanding RAM Timings
    382,009 views

    Latest Threads in Our Forums
    Corsair CX400W Power Supply Review
    by anonemus
    Tacens PSU: Any good?
    by anonemus
    Custom PC Help
    by thebigman101
    All Mobile Celeron Models
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Sparkle Announces 2 GB GeForce GT 220 Video Card
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    PowerColor Launches HD 5770 Eyefinity 5 Video Card
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    In Win Intros IRONCLAD Mid-Tower Case
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer Review
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    A-Data Intros 8 GB DDR3 Memory Kit
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    Epson WorkForce 610 All-in-One Printer
    by Hardware Secrets Team
    .:: Visit Our Forums ::.


    © 2004-10, Hardware Secrets, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Advertising | Legal Information | Privacy Policy
    All times are Pacific Standard Time (PST, GMT -08:00)